Multi-Hazard Exposure Mapping Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Case Study from Iran

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019, Vol.11 (16), p.1943
• Main Authors: Rahmati, Omid, Yousefi, Saleh, Kalantari, Zahra, Uuemaa, Evelyn, Teimurian, Teimur, Keesstra, Saskia, Pham, Tien, Tien Bui, Dieu
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Artificial intelligence; Asara watershed; Avalanches; Datasets; Decision making; Disaster management; Disasters; Ecosystems; Environmental factors; Exposure; Flood hazards; Flood predictions; Floods; hazard; Hazards; Hydrologic models; Hydrology; Information processing; Landslides; Learning algorithms; Machine learning; Mapping; Model accuracy; Modelling; Mountain regions; Mountainous areas; Mountains; natural disasters; Natural resources; Performance evaluation; Planning; R&D; Regression analysis; Remote sensing; Research & development; Roads & highways; Rockfall; Sentinel-1; Snow avalanches; Social-ecological systems; Support vector machines; Water conservation; Watersheds
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs11161943

Mountainous areas are highly prone to a variety of nature-triggered disasters, which often cause disabling harm, death, destruction, and damage. In this work, an attempt was made to develop an accurate multi-hazard exposure map for a mountainous area (Asara watershed, Iran), based on state-of-the art machine learning techniques. Hazard modeling for avalanches, rockfalls, and floods was performed using three state-of-the-art models—support vector machine (SVM), boosted regression tree (BRT), and generalized additive model (GAM). Topo-hydrological and geo-environmental factors were used as predictors in the models. A flood dataset (n = 133 flood events) was applied, which had been prepared using Sentinel-1-based processing and ground-based information. In addition, snow avalanche (n = 58) and rockfall (n = 101) data sets were used. The data set of each hazard type was randomly divided to two groups: Training (70%) and validation (30%). Model performance was evaluated by the true skill score (TSS) and the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) criteria. Using an exposure map, the multi-hazard map was converted into a multi-hazard exposure map. According to both validation methods, the SVM model showed the highest accuracy for avalanches (AUC = 92.4%, TSS = 0.72) and rockfalls (AUC = 93.7%, TSS = 0.81), while BRT demonstrated the best performance for flood hazards (AUC = 94.2%, TSS = 0.80). Overall, multi-hazard exposure modeling revealed that valleys and areas close to the Chalous Road, one of the most important roads in Iran, were associated with high and very high levels of risk. The proposed multi-hazard exposure framework can be helpful in supporting decision making on mountain social-ecological systems facing multiple hazards.