Loading…

Hydrophobic and hydrophilic functional groups and their impact on physical adsorption of CO2 in presence of H2O: A critical review

Surface functional groups (SFGs) play a key role in adsorption of any target molecule and CO2 is no exception. In fact, due to its quadrupole nature, different SFGs may attract either the oxygen or the carbon atoms to facilitate improved sorption characteristics in porous materials, hence the prolif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of CO2 utilization 2024-08, Vol.86, p.102908, Article 102908
Main Authors: Gorbounov, Mikhail, Halloran, Paul, Masoudi Soltani, Salman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Surface functional groups (SFGs) play a key role in adsorption of any target molecule and CO2 is no exception. In fact, due to its quadrupole nature, different SFGs may attract either the oxygen or the carbon atoms to facilitate improved sorption characteristics in porous materials, hence the proliferation of this approach in the context of carbon capture via solid adsorbents. However, actual processes involve CO2 capture/removal from a mixed gas stream that may have a non-negligible water content. The presence of humidity significantly hampers the sorption properties of classical physisorbents. To overcome this, the surface of the adsorbent can be modified to include hydrophobic/hydrophilic SFGs making the materials more resilient to moisture. However, the mechanisms behind H2O-tolerance depend greatly on the characteristics of SFGs themselves. Herein, a multitude of hydrophobic and hydrophilic SFGs (e.g. carbonyls, halogens, hydroxyls, nitro groups, phenyls, various alkyl chains and etc.) for physical CO2 adsorption are reviewed within the context of their separation performance in a humid environment, highlighting their merits and limitations as well as their impact on cooperative or competitive H2O – CO2 adsorption. [Display omitted] •H2O hampers CO2 adsorption on most physisorbents due to competitive adsorption.•Presence of surface functional groups impacts adsorption of both CO2 and H2O.•Hydrophobic functionalities usually decrease uptake of both CO2 and H2O.•Impact of hydrophilic functionalities on CO2 uptake from humid environments varies.•Interplay between pore size and surface functional group is case-specific.
ISSN:2212-9820
2212-9839
DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2024.102908