The use of point of care gastric ultrasound and anesthesia management in pediatric patients with preoperative fasting non-adherence scheduled for elective surgical procedures: a retrospective study

• Published in: BMC anesthesiology 2024-07, Vol.24 (1), p.237-6, Article 237
• Main Authors: Mecoli, Marc D, Sahu, Kirti, McSoley, Joseph W, Aronson, Lori A, Narayanasamy, Suryakumar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Anesthesia; Anesthesia - methods; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Cost control; Decision making; Elective Surgical Procedures - methods; Fasting; Female; Gastric ultrasound; Gastrointestinal Contents - diagnostic imaging; Health aspects; Health care access; Hospitals; Humans; Infant; Male; Management decisions; Medical personnel; Medical research; Medical societies; Medicine, Experimental; Patient compliance; Patients; Pediatric anesthesia; Pediatrics; Point of care testing; Point-of-Care Systems; Population; Preoperative Care - methods; Pulmonary aspiration; Retrospective Studies; Statistical analysis; Stomach - diagnostic imaging; Surgery; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography - methods; Ultrasound; Violations
• ISSN: 1471-2253; 1471-2253
• DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02628-0

Failure to adhere to perioperative fasting requirements increases aspiration risk and can lead to delay or cancellation of surgery. Point of care gastric ultrasound may guide decision-making to delay, cancel or proceed with surgery. This study aimed to describe gastric contents using point of care gastric ultrasound in pediatric patients with known fasting guideline violations presenting for elective surgery. This was a single-center retrospectivechart review of gastric ultrasound scans in patients presenting for elective surgeries with "nothing by mouth" violation (per fasting guidelines) or unclear fasting status. The primary outcome is description of gastric contents using point of care ultrasound. The ultrasound findings were classified as low-risk for aspiration (empty, clear fluid  1.5 ml/kg), or inconclusive study. Gastric ultrasound findings were communicated to the attending anesthesiologist. For patients proceeding without delay the estimated time saved was defined as the difference between ultrasound scan time and presumed case start time based on American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines. We identified 106 patients with a median age of 4.8 years. There were 31 patients (29.2%) that had ultrasound finding of high-risk gastric contents. These patients had cases that were delayed, cancelled or proceeded with rapid sequence intubation. Sixty-six patients (62.3%) were determined to be low-risk gastric contents and proceeded with surgery without delay. For these patients, a median of 2.6 h was saved. No aspiration events were recorded for any patients. It is feasible to use preoperative point of care gastric ultrasound to determine stomach contents and risk-stratify pediatric patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with fasting non-adherence. Preoperative gastric ultrasound may have a role in determining changes in anesthetic management in this patient population.