Modified furosemide responsiveness index and biomarkers for AKI progression and prognosis: a prospective observational study

• Published in: Annals of intensive care 2024-10, Vol.14 (1), p.156-13, Article 156
• Main Authors: Su, Ying, Liu, Wen-jun, Zhao, Yu-feng, Zhang, Yi-jie, Qiu, Yue, Lu, Zhi-hui, Wang, Peng, Lin, Shuang, Tu, Guo-wei, Luo, Zhe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acute kidney injury; AKI progression; Anesthesiology; Biomarkers; Critical Care Medicine; Cystatin C; Cytokines; Emergency Medicine; Furosemide stress test; Intensive; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Modified furosemide responsiveness index; Renal biomarker
• ISSN: 2110-5820; 2110-5820
• DOI: 10.1186/s13613-024-01387-y

Background Modified furosemide responsiveness index (mFRI) is a novel biomarker for assessing diuretic response and AKI progression in patients with early AKI. However, the comparative predictive performance of mFRI and novel renal biomarkers for adverse renal outcomes remains unclear. In a single-center prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the discriminatory abilities of mFRI and other novel renal biomarkers in predicting AKI progression and prognosis in patients with initial mild and moderate AKI (KDIGO stage 1 to 2). Results Patients with initial mild and moderate AKI within 48 h following cardiac surgery were included in this study. The mFRI, renal biomarkers (including serum or urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [sNGAL or uNGAL], serum cystatin C, urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glycosaminidase [uNAG], urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio) and cytokines (TNF, IL-1β, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured at AKI diagnosis. The mFRI was calculated for each patient, which was defined as 2-hour urine output divided by furosemide dose and body weight. Of 1013 included patients, 154 (15.2%) experienced AKI progression, with 59 (5.8%) progressing to stage 3 and 33 (3.3%) meeting the composite outcome of hospital mortality or receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The mFRI showed non-inferiority or potential superiority to renal biomarkers and cytokines in predicting AKI progression (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77–0.82), progression to stage 3 (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85–0.89), and composite outcome of death and receipt of RRT (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.82–0.87). Furthermore, the combination of a functional biomarker (mFRI) and a urinary injury biomarker (uNAG or uNGAL) resulted in a significant improvement in the prediction of adverse renal outcomes than either individual biomarker (all P