Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among indigenous adolescents in Guatemala: a cohort study

• Published in: Reproductive health 2022-06, Vol.19 (1), p.1-149, Article 149
• Main Authors: Gómez, Noe, Del Risco Sánchez, Odette, Pinho-Pompeu, Maira, Machado, Helymar, Bahamondes, Luis, Surita, Fernanda
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent pregnancy; Age groups; Childbirth; Childbirth & labor; Cohort analysis; Demographic aspects; Family; Forecasts and trends; Guatemala; Indigenous peoples; Indigenous women; Poverty; Pregnancy; Reproductive health; Sociodemographics; Teenage pregnancy; Teenagers; Vulnerability; Womens health
• ISSN: 1742-4755; 1742-4755
• DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01421-x

Objective To assess some characteristics and outcomes associated with pregnancy among Indigenous adolescents and compare them with other women who gave birth in a public hospital in Guatemala. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 8048 cases. Sociocultural variables, gynecological and obstetric history, childbirth, and perinatal outcomes were compared among women who gave birth at San Juan De Dios Hospital between January 2018 and June 2019. They were classified into four groups according to age and ethnicity. Indigenous adolescents (819/10.2%) were compared with Nonindigenous adolescents (813/10.1%), Indigenous adult women (3324/41.3%), and Nonindigenous adult women (3092/38.4%). Bivariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were applied. Results We found that Indigenous adolescents who gave birth in the public hospital had fewer years of schooling than Nonindigenous adolescents (p < 0.001), Indigenous adults (p < 0.001), and Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001). Indigenous adolescents were more likely to have an unplanned pregnancy than Nonindigenous adolescents (p = 0.038) and Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be single (p < 0.001) and use less previous contraception than Indigenous and Nonindigenous adult women (p = 0.007 and p = 0.013, respectively). More than one-third of Indigenous adolescents and adults did not attend antenatal care; Indigenous adolescents had fewer antenatal care visits than Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001), and the results were borderline in comparison to Nonindigenous adolescents (p = 0.051). Indigenous and Nonindigenous adult women underwent episiotomy less often than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 0.60 [95% CI 0.49-0.74] and OR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.45-0.70], respectively) and received less local anesthesia than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76] and OR: 0.77 [95% CI 0.60-0.99], respectively). Nonindigenous adults received more analgesia than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 1.36 [95% CI 1.07-1.73]). Nonindigenous adolescents had more newborns with low birth weight than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 1.44 [95% CI 1.10-1.87]). Conclusion Indigenous adolescents who gave birth in a public hospital in Guatemala were more likely to be single during pregnancy and attend fewer years of school than Nonindigenous adolescents. Unplanned pregnancies were more common among Indigenous adolescents, and some of them underwent not recommended obstetric practices during childbirth, such as episiotomy. Po