Loading…
Hyaluronan Sperm Selection during ICSI (HA-ICSI) Increases Embryo Utilization in Couples with Male Factor Infertility
Background: Hyaluronan (HA) sperm selection, utilizing the affinity of mature sperm for HA, has emerged as a technique to enhance the selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, conflicting evidence exists regarding the impact of HA-ICSI on clinical outcomes including fe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Fertility & reproduction 2024-03, Vol.6 (1), p.28-36 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Hyaluronan (HA) sperm selection, utilizing the affinity of mature sperm for HA, has emerged as a technique to enhance the selection of sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). However, conflicting evidence exists regarding the impact of HA-ICSI on clinical outcomes including fertilization, embryo utilization, and pregnancy rates. The study aimed to compare clinical outcomes including fertilization, utilization, and pregnancy rates between paired ICSI and HA-ICSI cycles within patients, particularly for male factor and low utilization subgroups.
Methods: A retrospective study from 3,988 ICSI treatment cycles was conducted between January 2018 and March 2022. A HA-ICSI cycle was paired with the preceding ICSI cycle from the same patient. Fertilization, utilization, and clinical pregnancy rates were compared based on infertility diagnosis and utilization rate (UR) from the initial ICSI cycle.
Results: There were no differences in fertilization, utilization, embryo quality, euploidy, or pregnancy rates between ICSI and HA-ICSI in all paired cycles. However, for patients with male factor infertility UR increased from 25.0% to 38.5% in their HA-ICSI cycle ([Formula: see text]). There was no difference observed for female factor infertility patients. HA-ICSI use was of particular benefit for male factor infertility patients with low ([Formula: see text]) embryo utilization in their initial ICSI cycle, evident by an increased utilization from 14.3% to 25.0% in their HA cycle ([Formula: see text]).
Conclusions: This is the first study to focus on the impact of HA-ICSI on embryo utilization, particularly in patients with male factor infertility. The efficacy of HA-ICSI as a sperm selection tool appears to be limited to improving UR in patients with male factor infertility, particularly those with low utilization in a previous ICSI cycle, with no significant effect on fertilization or pregnancy rates.
Conclusion: HA-ICSI may be useful for sperm selection at the time of ICSI for a select subgroup of patients. Male factor infertility patients, who have previously undertaken an ICSI cycle with less than 40% utilization, should be considered as candidates for treatment. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2661-3182 2661-3174 |
DOI: | 10.1142/S266131822450004X |