Loading…

Analysis of the Influence of the Size of Color-Calibrated Schlieren Filters on the General Sensitivity of Quantitative Schlieren Systems

The quantitative color schlieren technique is renowned for its capacity to convert deflection angles into color ratios. This technique has been instrumental in providing data on 2D flows. The current study delves into assessing how the geometry and optical characteristics of color filters impact the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fluids (Basel) 2024-09, Vol.9 (9), p.206
Main Authors: Prisăcariu, Emilia Georgiana, Prisecaru, Tudor, Dombrovschi, Mădălin Constantin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The quantitative color schlieren technique is renowned for its capacity to convert deflection angles into color ratios. This technique has been instrumental in providing data on 2D flows. The current study delves into assessing how the geometry and optical characteristics of color filters impact the sensitivity of the schlieren system. At present, there are many papers making the assumption that implementing a larger-sized color filter leads to better system sensitivity. However, having more calibration filter positions can lead to measurement errors due to the difficult calibration process. The present investigation focuses on the type of color filters created with a gradual evolution of colors. A turbulent, round water vapor jet serves as the test case. By comparing the results obtained with two different filter sizes, this analysis gives insight into the compromises made between system sensitivity and ease of calibration, helping one to better understand the trade-offs between the above-mentioned parameters. Moreover, the quantitative and qualitative results of the test case are presented to offer more comprehensive insights into quantitative color-calibrated schlieren.
ISSN:2311-5521
2311-5521
DOI:10.3390/fluids9090206