Mind the GAHP: A novel protocol for improved vascular access in the hypotensive patient

• Published in: Resuscitation plus 2024-09, Vol.19, p.100714, Article 100714
• Main Authors: Saab, Mathew A., Raetz, Emily L., Lowe, Joshua B., Hudson, Ian L., Jacobson, Eric J., Long, Adrianna N., Achay, Jennifer A., Bolleter, Scotty D., McCuller, Christopher A., Rayas, Emmanuel G., Nunnery, Alexander M., Bierle, Ryan P., Rahm, Stephen J., Epley, Emily A., Poe, Richard J., DeSoucy, Erik S., De Lorenzo, Robert A., Dumas, Ryan P., Paxton, James H., Rogerson, Tania C., Georgoff, Patrick E., Adema, Anne L., Eng Hock Ong, Marcus, Wampler, David A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Experimental Paper; Graduated vascular access; Hypotensive; Intraosseous; Resuscitation; Shock
• ISSN: 2666-5204; 2666-5204
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100714

Obtaining intravenous access in hypotensive patients is challenging and may critically delay resuscitation. The Graduated Vascular Access for Hypotensive Patient (GAHP) protocol leverages intraosseous fluid boluses to specifically dilate proximal veins. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of GAHP in maximizing venous targets through early distal intraosseous access and a small fluid bolus. This was a prospective randomized cadaveric pilot study to evaluate extremity venous engorgement during intraosseous infusion. Cadavers (n = 23) had an intraosseous needle inserted into four sites: distal radius, proximal humerus, distal femur, and distal tibia. Intraosseous saline was rapidly infused, venous optimization was measured using real-time ultrasound. Primary outcome was maximum vessel circumference increase with intraosseous infusion. Secondary outcomes were: time to maximum circumference, and infusion volume required. Statistical analyses included Levene’s test for equality of variances, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and generalized estimating equation. There was a significant mean increase of 1.03 cm (95% CI 0.86, 1.20), representing a difference of 102%. We found no significant difference in time to optimize vessel circumference across sites, but volume required significantly differed. GAHP quickly and effectively increased the circumference of anatomically adjacent veins. Anatomical sites did not differ on time to reach maximum enlargement of vessels following intraosseous infusion but did differ in terms of volume required to maximize vessel circumference. Further research is needed using live, hypotensive patients.