Loading…

Advantages of cone beam computed tomography for evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee compared to MRI

To determine the diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee. Consecutive patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee examined by 3 T MRI and CBCT o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2024-07, Vol.14 (1), p.15278-9, Article 15278
Main Authors: Delsmann, Maximilian M., Delsmann, Julian, Jandl, Nico Maximilian, Maas, Kai-Jonathan, Beil, Frank Timo, Amling, Michael, Henes, Frank Oliver, Rolvien, Tim, Spink, Clemens
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To determine the diagnostic yield of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared with 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee. Consecutive patients with subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee examined by 3 T MRI and CBCT of the femoral condyles were reviewed. Two experienced raters graded the lesion severity on 3 T MRI and CBCT images: grade 1: no signs of a subchondral bone lesion; grade 2: subchondral trabecular fracture or cystic changes, but without infraction of the subchondral bone plate; grade 3: collapse of the subchondral bone plate. Ratings were repeated after six weeks to determine reliability. In addition, the bone lesion size was measured as elliptical area (mm 2 ) and compared between CBCT and T1-weighted MRI sequences. Among 30 patients included (43.3% women; mean age: 60.9 ± 12.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 29.0 ± 12.8 kg/m 2 ), the medial femoral condyle was affected in 21/30 patients (70%). The grading of subchondral lesions between MRI and CBCT did not match in 12 cases (40%). Based on MRI images, an underestimation (i.e., undergrading) compared with CBCT was observed in nine cases (30%), whereas overgrading occurred in three cases (10%). Compared to CBCT, routine T1-weighted 3 T sequences significantly overestimated osseus defect zones in sagittal (84.7 ± 68.9 mm 2 vs. 35.9 ± 38.2 mm 2 , p 
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-64591-7