Loading…

Effect of feed and process variables on nutritional quality of maize-millet based soy fortified extruded product using response surface methodology

•Process parameters are the most prominent factors on nutritional quality of product.•Extrudates developed by using locally available raw materials is high in protein.•This product is nutritionally balanced compared to other extruded products.•It can be helpful in increasing the economy of farmers a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Food Research 2022-12, Vol.2 (2), p.100139, Article 100139
Main Authors: Sahu, Chandrahas, Patel, S., Khokhar, D., Naik, R.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Process parameters are the most prominent factors on nutritional quality of product.•Extrudates developed by using locally available raw materials is high in protein.•This product is nutritionally balanced compared to other extruded products.•It can be helpful in increasing the economy of farmers as well as producers. Composite flour comprising of maize, finger millet, defatted soy and elephant foot yam in the ratio of 40:30:20:10 was utilized for the development of an extruded product. The experiment was conducted to study the effects of process variables, namely barrel temperature: 100–150 °C, screw speed: 110–350 rpm and feed moisture: 12–20% (wb) on the nutritional quality of product by using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). The nutritional qualities like moisture content, carbohydrate content and protein content were affected significantly by barrel temperature, screw speed and feed moisture content, but fat and crude fiber content did not indicate any appreciable variation with process variables. The nutritional values of extruded products were found to be vary from 6.14 to 9.78% product moisture, 13.96–16.81% protein, 0.49–1.07% fat, 64.99–72.98% carbohydrate, and 2.48–3.36% fiber content.
ISSN:2772-5022
2772-5022
DOI:10.1016/j.afres.2022.100139