Uncertainty in the mating strategy of honeybees causes bias and unreliability in the estimates of genetic parameters

• Published in: Genetics selection evolution (Paris) 2024-04, Vol.56 (1), p.30-30, Article 30
• Main Authors: Kistler, Tristan, Brascamp, Evert W, Basso, Benjamin, Bijma, Piter, Phocas, Florence
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Animal reproduction; Artificial insemination; Bees; Bias; Breeding; Drones; Estimates; Genetic diversity; Genetic effects; Genetic variance; Honeybee; Life Sciences; Mathematical models; Mating; Parameters; Pedigree; Phenotypes; Population (statistical); Queens; Simulation; Standard error; Trends; Workers
• ISSN: 1297-9686; 0999-193X; 1297-9686
• DOI: 10.1186/s12711-024-00898-3

Breeding queens may be mated with drones that are produced by a single drone-producing queen (DPQ), or a group of sister-DPQs, but often only the dam of the DPQ(s) is reported in the pedigree. Furthermore, datasets may include colony phenotypes from DPQs that were open-mated at different locations, and thus to a heterogeneous drone population. Simulation was used to investigate the impact of the mating strategy and its modelling on the estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trends when the DPQs are treated in different ways in the statistical evaluation model. We quantified the bias and standard error of the estimates when breeding queens were mated to one DPQ or a group of DPQs, assuming that this information was known or not. We also investigated four alternative strategies to accommodate the phenotypes of open-mated DPQs in the genetic evaluation: excluding their phenotypes, adding a dummy pseudo-sire in the pedigree, or adding a non-genetic (fixed or random) effect to the statistical evaluation model to account for the origin of the mates. The most precise estimates of genetic parameters and genetic trends were obtained when breeding queens were mated with drones of single DPQs that are correctly assigned in the pedigree. However, when they were mated with drones from one or a group of DPQs, and this information was not known, erroneous assumptions led to considerable bias in these estimates. Furthermore, genetic variances were considerably overestimated when phenotypes of colonies from open-mated DPQs were adjusted for their mates by adding a dummy pseudo-sire in the pedigree for each subpopulation of open-mating drones. On the contrary, correcting for the heterogeneous drone population by adding a non-genetic effect in the evaluation model produced unbiased estimates. Knowing only the dam of the DPQ(s) used in each mating may lead to erroneous assumptions on how DPQs were used and severely bias the estimates of genetic parameters and trends. Thus, we recommend keeping track of DPQs in the pedigree, and not only of the dams of DPQ(s). Records from DPQ colonies with queens open-mated to a heterogeneous drone population can be integrated by adding non-genetic effects to the statistical evaluation model.