Efficacy and non-target impact of spinosad, Bti and temephos larvicides for control of Anopheles spp. in an endemic malaria region of southern Mexico

• Published in: Parasites & vectors 2014-01, Vol.7 (1), p.55-55, Article 55
• Main Authors: Marina, Carlos F, Bond, J Guillermo, Muñoz, José, Valle, Javier, Novelo-Gutiérrez, Rodolfo, Williams, Trevor
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Anopheles; Anopheles - classification; Anopheles - drug effects; Anopheles albimanus; Aquatic Insect; aquatic insects; Biodiversity; Coleoptera; Comparative analysis; Culex; Drug Combinations; field experimentation; granules; Hemiptera; immatures; Insecticides - pharmacology; Insects, Aquatic; Larvicidal Activity; larvicides; Macrolides - pharmacology; Malaria; Malaria - epidemiology; Malaria - prevention & control; Malaria - transmission; Malathion; Mexico - epidemiology; Mosquito Control; Mosquito Larva; Odonata; Spinosad; Temefos - pharmacology; temephos; tropics; Uranotaenia; Uranotaenia lowii; wet season
• ISSN: 1756-3305; 1756-3305
• DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-55

BACKGROUND: The larvicidal efficacy of the naturally derived insecticide spinosad, for control of immature stages of Anopheles albimanus and associated culicids, was compared to that of synthetic and biological larvicides. Effects on non-target insects were also determined. METHODS: A field trial was performed in replicated temporary pools during the rainy season, in southern Mexico. Pools were treated with 10 ppm a.i. spinosad (Tracer 480SC), Bti granules applied at 2 kg/ha (VectoBac WDG, ABG-6511), and 100 ml/ha temephos (50 EC), or an untreated control. Numbers of immature mosquitoes, and aquatic insects in pools were monitored for 20 weeks. RESULTS: Samples of immature mosquitoes comprised approximately 10% An. albimanus, 70% Culex spp. (mostly Cx. melanoconion and Cx. coronator) and 20% Uranotaenia lowii. The most effective larvicides were spinosad and temephos that eliminated An. albimanus in 16 out of 20 post-treatment samples, or 9 weeks of continuous control of immature stages, respectively. These larvicides resulted in 15 and 5 weeks of elimination of Culex spp., respectively, or 20 and 4 weeks of continuous elimination of U. lowii, respectively. Bti treatment provided little consistent control. Aquatic insects were recorded comprising 3 orders, 20 families, 40 genera and 44 species. Shannon diversity index values (H’) for aquatic insects were highest in the control (0.997) and Bti (0.974) treatments, intermediate in the spinosad treatment (0.638) and lowest in the temephos treatment (0.520). Severely affected non-target insects in the spinosad and temephos treated pools were predatory Coleoptera, Hemiptera and Odonata, which in the case of spinosad was likely due to the high concentration applied. Bti had little effect on aquatic insects. CONCLUSIONS: The spinosad treatment retained larvicidal activity for markedly longer than expected. Spinosad is likely to be an effective tool for control of anopheline and other pool-breeding mosquitoes in tropical regions. Non-target effects of spinosad on aquatic insects merit further study, but were likely related to the concentration of the product used.