Resident Skills Assessment in Corneal Suturing: A Comprehensive Review of Currently Proposed Educational Programs and Evaluation Tools

• Published in: Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) 2021-07, Vol.13 (2), p.e304-e310
• Main Authors: Dormegny, Lea, Neumann, Nicole, Lejay, Anne, Sauer, Arnaud, Gaucher, David, Chakfe, Nabil, Bourcier, Tristan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: assessment; corneal suture; education; residents; training
• ISSN: 2475-4757; 2475-4757
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740065

This study aimed to perform a comprehensive review of publications proposing educational programs for resident skills assessment in corneal suturing.  An extensive online article search in PubMed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PISMA) reporting guidelines was performed to identify prospective comparative studies or prospective before/after studies published up to March 2021 and reporting the assessment of ophthalmology residents' skills in corneal suturing during dedicated training sessions.  Three studies were identified for review. The first reported the efficiency of an electromagnetic tracking system placed on the surgeon's fingers coupled with a computer analysis of movements and time to identify surgeons with different backgrounds in corneal suturing. The second reported the efficiency of the reference system in assessing the improvement of corneal suturing conducted by residents after a training session, with video-based assessment for economy and confidence of movement, limiting tissue damage and precision of operative technique, reviewed by blind assessors. The third proposed an innovative remote corneal suturing training method using Zoom for direct feedback to the residents. The stitch quality was assessed for length, depth, radiality, and tension. The results were similar when compared with a group of residents without feedback.  This review underlines the rarity and disparity of available tools for corneal suturing assessment, justifying the need for more complete models to be designed. These should consider body ergonomics and stitch quality and time. Comparative studies involving novices and attendings may provide reliable evaluation of existing gaps and specific metrics to target, helping residents to approach their superiors' experience.