Loading…

Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus

The current study aimed at investigating the occurrence and features of olfactory dysfunction in patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Patients with laboratory and clinically confirmed COVID-19 infection were enrolled in this longitudinal study. They were managed in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology 2021-05, Vol.33 (116), p.163-171
Main Authors: Bakhshaee, Mehdi, Barzegar-Amini, Maral, Motedayen, Zohreh, Khojasteh-Taheri, Roshanak, Rafiee, Mahdi, Amini, Mahnaz, Layegh, Parvaneh, Hashemzadeh, Kamila, Omidvar, Delaram, Hwang, Peter H, Hosseinpoor, Masoomeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The current study aimed at investigating the occurrence and features of olfactory dysfunction in patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Patients with laboratory and clinically confirmed COVID-19 infection were enrolled in this longitudinal study. They were managed in either the inpatient or outpatient setting. The demographic, clinical, and outcome data were retrieved from patients' medical records. Olfactory dysfunction features, including the onset pattern, duration, and recovery time were investigated. The visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized as a self-rating subjective measurement of olfactory function. According to the results, the mean age of the patients (n=502) was obtained at 46.8±18.5 years; moreover, 52.4% and 47.6% of cases were female and male, respectively. It was also revealed that 35.4% and 64.5% of the subjects were outpatients and hospitalized, respectively. Based on the findings, 178 (38.4%) subjects had olfactory dysfunction. The mean values of VAS in hyposmic patients were estimated at 2.5±2.5, 8.3 ±2.1, and 9.4±1.6 at the first evaluation, in 2 weeks, and after 1 month of follow-up (P
ISSN:2251-7251
2251-726X
DOI:10.22038/ijorl.2021.51614.2750