Effect of Brachytherapy vs. External Beam Radiotherapy on Sexual Function in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Frontiers in cell and developmental biology 2022-01, Vol.9, p.792597-792597
• Main Authors: Xie, Xiaodu, Zhang, Yuanfeng, Ge, Chengguo, Liang, Peihe
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: brachytherapy; Cell and Developmental Biology; external beam radiotherapy; localized prostate cancer; meta-analysis; sexual function
• ISSN: 2296-634X; 2296-634X
• DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.792597

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of brachytherapy (BT) versus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on sexual function in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). Data were retrieved from the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Database until March 4, 2021. Analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.4.1. The main clinical outcomes were the Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices (PCSI) scale and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scale scores for sexual function. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and their 95% CI. This study has undergone PROSPERO registration (No. CDR42021245438). Among the 962 studies retrieved, eight prospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, covering a total of 2,340 patients, including 1,138 treated with BT alone and 1,202 treated with EBRT alone. The results demonstrated that BT was to some extent advantageous over EBRT in overall sexual function scores in patients with localized PCa during the immediate post-treatment period (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.18 to -0.01, = 0.03), but this difference was not detectable at 3 months (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI: -0.18-0.05, and = 0.25), 12 months (SMD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.21-0.20, and = 0.96), and 24 months (SMD = -0.09, 95% CI: -0.20-0.01, and = 0.09) after treatment. Our analysis showed that BT showed a short-term advantage over EBRT in terms of sexual function in patients with localized PCa, but this difference diminished over time, though the conclusion needs to be further verified by a longer-term follow-up study.