Loading…
Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution
Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Scientific reports 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83 |
container_end_page | 2594 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2594 |
container_title | Scientific reports |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Li, Xinyu Zhang, Yuanhao Liao, Yumin Yu, Guanghai |
description | Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb
−1
. In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2920375466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCdjjOIlXCFUFKlViAysW1vh26qMkPthOoW-P05TSssALX2Z-f54ZT1W9pOQtJWx4l1rKxdAQaBvOgA0NPKmOgbS8AQbw9MH-qDpNaU_K4CBaKp5XR2wA0RNBjqvv5_O1j2Ge7JxxrP10QJ1rTMmmtNrq4GqFOdt4U6vwy6ZyStbUYa5Hv7vKP-061xMWhS-AtKiUfV6yD_OL6pnDMdnTu_Wk-vbx_OvZ5-byy6eLsw-XjeYtzU1viHCuG4xjSmurNIBRBpFSAaznA4XeupKsU9Bqg1z0vesIQ0P7VjA1sJPqYuOagHt5iH7CeCMDenlrCHEnMWavRyu1YJwapwX0ru24EZoIwTSiUWiYsIX1fmMdFjVZo0sJIo6PoI89s7-Su3AtKRkY4RwK4c0dIYYfi01ZTj5pO44427AkCQIopZwPa-Cv_5HuwxLnUqtVRUrybdcVFWwqHUNK0br7aCiRay_IrRdk6QV52wtyjeLVwzzur_z5-SJgmyAV17yz8e_b_8H-Bgc1wcM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920375466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><description>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb
−1
. In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38297090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/166/988 ; 704/172/4081 ; Acidification ; Aluminum ; Aluminum alloys ; Climate change ; Composite materials ; Electric vehicles ; Emission measurements ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact assessment ; Global warming ; Greenhouse gases ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Life cycles ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sheet molding compounds ; Steel ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920375466/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920375466?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38297090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb
−1
. In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</description><subject>639/166/988</subject><subject>704/172/4081</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum alloys</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sheet molding compounds</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCdjjOIlXCFUFKlViAysW1vh26qMkPthOoW-P05TSssALX2Z-f54ZT1W9pOQtJWx4l1rKxdAQaBvOgA0NPKmOgbS8AQbw9MH-qDpNaU_K4CBaKp5XR2wA0RNBjqvv5_O1j2Ge7JxxrP10QJ1rTMmmtNrq4GqFOdt4U6vwy6ZyStbUYa5Hv7vKP-061xMWhS-AtKiUfV6yD_OL6pnDMdnTu_Wk-vbx_OvZ5-byy6eLsw-XjeYtzU1viHCuG4xjSmurNIBRBpFSAaznA4XeupKsU9Bqg1z0vesIQ0P7VjA1sJPqYuOagHt5iH7CeCMDenlrCHEnMWavRyu1YJwapwX0ru24EZoIwTSiUWiYsIX1fmMdFjVZo0sJIo6PoI89s7-Su3AtKRkY4RwK4c0dIYYfi01ZTj5pO44427AkCQIopZwPa-Cv_5HuwxLnUqtVRUrybdcVFWwqHUNK0br7aCiRay_IrRdk6QV52wtyjeLVwzzur_z5-SJgmyAV17yz8e_b_8H-Bgc1wcM</recordid><startdate>20240131</startdate><enddate>20240131</enddate><creator>Li, Xinyu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuanhao</creator><creator>Liao, Yumin</creator><creator>Yu, Guanghai</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240131</creationdate><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><author>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>639/166/988</topic><topic>704/172/4081</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum alloys</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sheet molding compounds</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xinyu</au><au>Zhang, Yuanhao</au><au>Liao, Yumin</au><au>Yu, Guanghai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2024-01-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2594</spage><epage>2594</epage><pages>2594-2594</pages><artnum>2594</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb
−1
. In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38297090</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2045-2322 |
ispartof | Scientific reports, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594 |
issn | 2045-2322 2045-2322 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 639/166/988 704/172/4081 Acidification Aluminum Aluminum alloys Climate change Composite materials Electric vehicles Emission measurements Emissions Environmental impact Environmental impact assessment Global warming Greenhouse gases Humanities and Social Sciences Life cycles multidisciplinary Science Science (multidisciplinary) Sensitivity analysis Sheet molding compounds Steel Toxicity |
title | Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20of%20battery%20boxes%20based%20on%20lightweight%20material%20substitution&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Li,%20Xinyu&rft.date=2024-01-31&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2594&rft.epage=2594&rft.pages=2594-2594&rft.artnum=2594&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2920375466%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920375466&rft_id=info:pmid/38297090&rfr_iscdi=true |