Loading…

Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution

Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594
Main Authors: Li, Xinyu, Zhang, Yuanhao, Liao, Yumin, Yu, Guanghai
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83
container_end_page 2594
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2594
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 14
creator Li, Xinyu
Zhang, Yuanhao
Liao, Yumin
Yu, Guanghai
description Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb −1 . In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2920375466</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCdjjOIlXCFUFKlViAysW1vh26qMkPthOoW-P05TSssALX2Z-f54ZT1W9pOQtJWx4l1rKxdAQaBvOgA0NPKmOgbS8AQbw9MH-qDpNaU_K4CBaKp5XR2wA0RNBjqvv5_O1j2Ge7JxxrP10QJ1rTMmmtNrq4GqFOdt4U6vwy6ZyStbUYa5Hv7vKP-061xMWhS-AtKiUfV6yD_OL6pnDMdnTu_Wk-vbx_OvZ5-byy6eLsw-XjeYtzU1viHCuG4xjSmurNIBRBpFSAaznA4XeupKsU9Bqg1z0vesIQ0P7VjA1sJPqYuOagHt5iH7CeCMDenlrCHEnMWavRyu1YJwapwX0ru24EZoIwTSiUWiYsIX1fmMdFjVZo0sJIo6PoI89s7-Su3AtKRkY4RwK4c0dIYYfi01ZTj5pO44427AkCQIopZwPa-Cv_5HuwxLnUqtVRUrybdcVFWwqHUNK0br7aCiRay_IrRdk6QV52wtyjeLVwzzur_z5-SJgmyAV17yz8e_b_8H-Bgc1wcM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920375466</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><description>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb −1 . In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38297090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>639/166/988 ; 704/172/4081 ; Acidification ; Aluminum ; Aluminum alloys ; Climate change ; Composite materials ; Electric vehicles ; Emission measurements ; Emissions ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact assessment ; Global warming ; Greenhouse gases ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Life cycles ; multidisciplinary ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sheet molding compounds ; Steel ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920375466/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920375466?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38297090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb −1 . In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</description><subject>639/166/988</subject><subject>704/172/4081</subject><subject>Acidification</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum alloys</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Electric vehicles</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sheet molding compounds</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAkdiwCdjjOIlXCFUFKlViAysW1vh26qMkPthOoW-P05TSssALX2Z-f54ZT1W9pOQtJWx4l1rKxdAQaBvOgA0NPKmOgbS8AQbw9MH-qDpNaU_K4CBaKp5XR2wA0RNBjqvv5_O1j2Ge7JxxrP10QJ1rTMmmtNrq4GqFOdt4U6vwy6ZyStbUYa5Hv7vKP-061xMWhS-AtKiUfV6yD_OL6pnDMdnTu_Wk-vbx_OvZ5-byy6eLsw-XjeYtzU1viHCuG4xjSmurNIBRBpFSAaznA4XeupKsU9Bqg1z0vesIQ0P7VjA1sJPqYuOagHt5iH7CeCMDenlrCHEnMWavRyu1YJwapwX0ru24EZoIwTSiUWiYsIX1fmMdFjVZo0sJIo6PoI89s7-Su3AtKRkY4RwK4c0dIYYfi01ZTj5pO44427AkCQIopZwPa-Cv_5HuwxLnUqtVRUrybdcVFWwqHUNK0br7aCiRay_IrRdk6QV52wtyjeLVwzzur_z5-SJgmyAV17yz8e_b_8H-Bgc1wcM</recordid><startdate>20240131</startdate><enddate>20240131</enddate><creator>Li, Xinyu</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuanhao</creator><creator>Liao, Yumin</creator><creator>Yu, Guanghai</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240131</creationdate><title>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</title><author>Li, Xinyu ; Zhang, Yuanhao ; Liao, Yumin ; Yu, Guanghai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>639/166/988</topic><topic>704/172/4081</topic><topic>Acidification</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum alloys</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Electric vehicles</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sheet molding compounds</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Yumin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guanghai</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Xinyu</au><au>Zhang, Yuanhao</au><au>Liao, Yumin</au><au>Yu, Guanghai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2024-01-31</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2594</spage><epage>2594</epage><pages>2594-2594</pages><artnum>2594</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Power battery is one of the core components of electric vehicles (EVs) and a major contributor to the environmental impact of EVs, and reducing their environmental emissions can help enhance the sustainability of electric vehicles. Based on the principle of stiffness equivalence, the steel case of the power cell is replaced with lightweight materials, a life cycle model is established with the help of GaBi software, and its environmental impact is evaluated using the CML2001 method. The results can be summarized as follows: (1) Based on the four environmental impact categories of GWP, AP, ADP (f), and HTP, which are the global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP (f)) and human toxicity potential (HTP), the environmental impact of lightweight materials is lower than that of the steel box. Among them, the aluminum alloy box has the largest reduction, and the Carbon Fiber Sheet Molding Compound (CF-SMC) box is the second. (2) In the sensitivity analysis of electric structure, an aluminum alloy box is still the most preferable choice for environmental impact. (3) In the sensitivity analysis of driving mileage, the aluminum alloy box body is also the best choice for vehicle life. (4) Quantitative assessment using substitution factors measures the decrease in greenhouse gas emissions following the substitution of steel battery box with lightweight materials. The adoption of aluminum alloy battery box can lead to a reduction of 1.55 tons of greenhouse gas emissions, with a substitution factor of 1.55 tC sb −1 . In the case that composite materials have not been recycled commercially on a large scale, aluminum alloy is still one of the best materials for the integrated environmental impact of the whole life cycle of the battery boxes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38297090</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.2594-2594, Article 2594
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c9351dfc927f465d9c0993caadbad39e
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 639/166/988
704/172/4081
Acidification
Aluminum
Aluminum alloys
Climate change
Composite materials
Electric vehicles
Emission measurements
Emissions
Environmental impact
Environmental impact assessment
Global warming
Greenhouse gases
Humanities and Social Sciences
Life cycles
multidisciplinary
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Sensitivity analysis
Sheet molding compounds
Steel
Toxicity
title Environmental impact assessment of battery boxes based on lightweight material substitution
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20impact%20assessment%20of%20battery%20boxes%20based%20on%20lightweight%20material%20substitution&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Li,%20Xinyu&rft.date=2024-01-31&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2594&rft.epage=2594&rft.pages=2594-2594&rft.artnum=2594&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-024-53238-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2920375466%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-7d09ff68df3bccebc22dbdaa11923758127ef159fb24cda5977f603ad17493b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920375466&rft_id=info:pmid/38297090&rfr_iscdi=true