Through the eyes of Spanish-speaking patients, caregivers, and community leaders: a qualitative study on the in-patient hospital experience

• Published in: International journal for equity in health 2024-08, Vol.23 (1), p.164-16
• Main Authors: Nguyen, Nicholas V, Guillen Lozoya, Andres H, Caruso, Maria A, Capetillo Porraz, Maria Graciela D, Pacheco-Spann, Laura M, Allyse, Megan A, Barwise, Amelia K
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis; Book publishing; Care and treatment; Caregivers; Caregivers - psychology; Communication Barriers; Community engaged research; COVID-19; Decision Making; English language; Female; Focus Groups; Health aspects; Hispanic Americans; Hispanic or Latino - psychology; Hispanic populations; Hospitalization; Hospitals; Humans; Interpreter; Interpreters; Interviews as Topic; Language; Language barriers; Male; Medical care; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Methods; Middle Aged; NELP; Non-English languages; Patient education; Patients; Practice; Qualitative Research; Quality management; Social aspects; Translating and interpreting; Utilization
• ISSN: 1475-9276; 1475-9276
• DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02246-9

Spanish-speakers with non-English language preference and complex medical needs suffer disparities in quality of care, safety, and health outcomes. Communication challenges during prolonged hospitalizations for complex illnesses negatively influence how this group engages in their care and decision-making while hospitalized. Limited literature capturing the perspectives of Spanish-speaking patients in this context exists. Given the impact of language barriers on care and medical decision-making, this study documents the experiences of Spanish-speaking patients with NELP and hospitalized with complex care needs as well as caregivers and community leaders. Using community-engaged recruitment strategies and semi-structured interviews and a focus group, we gathered insights from Spanish-speaking patients hospitalized for prolonged periods, caregivers, and community leaders from three geographic regions. Data were deidentified, transcribed, translated, coded in duplicate, and analyzed guided by grounded theory using NVivo. We interviewed 40 participants: 27 patients, 10 caregivers and 3 community leaders. We identified four major themes: (1) Disconnected experiences impeding interactions, communication, and decision-making (2) Inadequate interpreter services (3) Benefits and consequences of family at the bedside (4) Community -informed recommendations. The study showed that in-person interpreters were preferred to virtual interpreters; yet interpreter access was suboptimal. This resulted in ad hoc family interpretation. Participants noted language negatively impacted patient's hospital experience, including decreasing confidence in medical decision-making. Recommendations from patients, caregivers, and community leaders included expanding interpreter access, bolstering interpreter quality and accuracy, and increasing resources for patient education.