Loading…

Comparison of 0.05% cyclosporine and 3% diquafosol solution for dry eye patients: a randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical trial

This study is aim to compare the clinical effectiveness between the two most prominent dry eye disease (DED)-specific eye drops, 0.05% cyclosporine (CN) and 3% diquafosol (DQ). This is a multi-centered, randomized, masked, prospective clinical study. A total of 153 DED patients were randomly allocat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC ophthalmology 2019-06, Vol.19 (1), p.131-9
Main Authors: Park, Chang Hyun, Lee, Hyung Keun, Kim, Mee Kum, Kim, Eun Chul, Kim, Jae Yong, Kim, Tae-Im, Kim, Hong Kyun, Song, Jong Suk, Yoon, Kyung Chul, Lee, Do Hyung, Chung, Tae-Young, Choi, Chul Young, Kim, Hyun Seung
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study is aim to compare the clinical effectiveness between the two most prominent dry eye disease (DED)-specific eye drops, 0.05% cyclosporine (CN) and 3% diquafosol (DQ). This is a multi-centered, randomized, masked, prospective clinical study. A total of 153 DED patients were randomly allocated to use CN twice per day or DQ six times daily. Cornea and conjunctival staining scores (NEI scale), tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer test scores, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score were measured at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. At 12 weeks after treatment, NEI scaled scores were significantly reduced from the baseline by - 6.60 for CN and - 6.63 for DQ group (all P 
ISSN:1471-2415
1471-2415
DOI:10.1186/s12886-019-1136-8