Prognostic analysis and outcomes of metastatic pancreatic cancer patients receiving nab‐paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as second or later‐line treatment

• Published in: Cancer medicine (Malden, MA) MA), 2024-06, Vol.13 (12), p.e7345-n/a
• Main Authors: Giordano, Guido, Milella, Michele, Landriscina, Matteo, Bergamo, Francesca, Tirino, Giuseppe, Santaniello, Antonio, Zaniboni, Alberto, Vasile, Enrico, De Vita, Ferdinando, Re, Giovanni Lo, Vaccaro, Vanja, Giommoni, Elisa, Natale, Donato, Conca, Raffaele, Santini, Daniele, Maiorino, Luigi, Sanna, Gianni, Ricci, Vincenzo, Iop, Aldo, Montesarchio, Vincenzo, Procaccio, Letizia, Noventa, Silvia, Bianco, Roberto, Febbraro, Antonio, Lonardi, Sara, Tortora, Giampaolo, Sperduti, Isabella, Melisi, Davide
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albumins - administration & dosage; Albumins - adverse effects; Albumins - therapeutic use; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use; Cancer therapies; Chemotherapy; Deoxycytidine - administration & dosage; Deoxycytidine - analogs & derivatives; Deoxycytidine - therapeutic use; Disease control; Feasibility studies; Female; FOLFIRINOX; Gemcitabine; Humans; Italy; Labeling; Liver; Male; Medical prognosis; Metastases; Metastasis; Middle Aged; Multivariate analysis; nab‐paclitaxel; Neoplasm Metastasis; Paclitaxel; Paclitaxel - administration & dosage; Paclitaxel - adverse effects; Paclitaxel - therapeutic use; Pancreatic cancer; Pancreatic Neoplasms - drug therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality; Pancreatic Neoplasms - pathology; Patients; Population studies; Prognosis; prognostic model; Retrospective Studies; second‐line chemotherapy; Surgery; Toxicity; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 2045-7634; 2045-7634
• DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7345

Background Pancreatic cancer (PC) first‐line therapy often consists of polychemotherapy regimens, but choosing a second‐line therapy after disease progression, especially following first‐line FOLFIRINOX, remains a clinical challenge. This study presents results from a large, multicenter, retrospective analysis of Italian patients with metastatic PC (mPC) treated with Nab‐paclitaxel/Gemcitabine (AG) as second or later line of treatment. Main objective of the study is to identify prognostic factors that could inform treatment decisions. Methods The study included 160 mPC patients treated with AG in 17 Italian institutions. AG was administered according to labelling dose, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. Variations in schedules, dose modifications, supportive measures, and response evaluation were determined by individual clinicians' practice. Results AG was well‐tolerated and exhibited promising clinical activity. The overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 22.5% and 45.6%, respectively. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 and 6.8 months, respectively. Among the patients who received AG as a second‐line therapy (n = 111, 66.9%), median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 7.4 months, respectively. Notably, in the 76 patients (68%) receiving AG after first‐line FOLFIRINOX, an ORR of 19.7% and a DCR of 46.0% were observed, resulting in a median PFS of 3.5 and median OS of 5.7 months. The study identified specific clinical or laboratory parameters (LDH, NLR, fasting serum glucose, liver metastases, ECOG PS, and first‐line PFS) as independent prognostic factors at multivariate level. These factors were used to create a prognostic nomogram that divided patients into three risk classes, helping to predict second‐line OS and PFS. Conclusions This study represents the largest real‐world population of mPC patients treated with AG as a second or later line of therapy. It supports the feasibility of this regimen following first‐line FOLFIRINOX, particularly in patients with specific clinical and laboratory characteristics who derived prolonged benefit from first‐line therapy.