Loading…
Reducing uncertainties in satellite estimates of aerosol–cloud interactions over the subtropical ocean by integrating vertically resolved aerosol observations
Satellite quantification of aerosol effects on clouds relies on aerosol optical depth (AOD) as a proxy for aerosol concentration or cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). However, the lack of error characterization of satellite-based results hampers their use for the evaluation and improvement of global c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2020-06, Vol.20 (12), p.7167-7177 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Satellite quantification of aerosol effects on clouds relies on
aerosol optical depth (AOD) as a proxy for aerosol concentration or cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN). However, the lack of error characterization of
satellite-based results hampers their use for the evaluation and improvement
of global climate models. We show that the use of AOD for assessing
aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) is inadequate over vast oceanic areas in
the subtropics. Instead, we postulate that a more physical approach that
consists of matching vertically resolved aerosol data from the Cloud-Aerosol
Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) satellite at
the cloud-layer height with Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua cloud retrievals reduces uncertainties in
satellite-based ACI estimates. Combined aerosol extinction coefficients
(σ) below cloud top (σBC) from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar
with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) and cloud droplet number
concentrations (Nd) from MODIS Aqua yield high correlations across a
broad range of σBC values, with σBC quartile
correlations ≥0.78. In contrast, CALIOP-based AOD yields correlations
with MODIS Nd of 0.54–0.62 for the two lower AOD quartiles. Moreover,
σBC explains 41 % of the spatial variance in MODIS Nd,
whereas AOD only explains 17 %, primarily caused by the lack of spatial
covariability in the eastern Pacific. Compared with σBC,
near-surface σ weakly correlates in space with MODIS Nd,
accounting for a 16 % variance. It is concluded that the linear regression
calculated from ln(Nd)–ln(σBC) (the standard method for
quantifying ACIs) is more physically meaningful than that derived from the
Nd–AOD pair. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1680-7324 1680-7316 1680-7324 |
DOI: | 10.5194/acp-20-7167-2020 |