Loading…
Passive Animal Surveillance to Identify Ticks in Wisconsin, 2011-2017
The introduction of new tick species poses a risk to human and animal health. Systematic active surveillance programs are expensive and uncommon. We evaluated a passive animal surveillance program as a monitoring tool to document the geographic distribution and host associations of ticks in Wisconsi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Insects (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2019-09, Vol.10 (9), p.289 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The introduction of new tick species poses a risk to human and animal health. Systematic active surveillance programs are expensive and uncommon. We evaluated a passive animal surveillance program as a monitoring tool to document the geographic distribution and host associations of ticks in Wisconsin. Passive surveillance partners included veterinary medical clinics, domestic animal shelters, and wildlife rehabilitation centers from 35 of the 72 Wisconsin counties. A total of 10,136 tick specimens were collected from 2325 animals from July 2011 to November 2017 and included
Say (29.7% of all ticks),
Banks (25.5%),
Say (19.5%),
Packard (13.8%),
Packard (4.4%), and
Packard (1.7%). Less common species ( |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2075-4450 2075-4450 |
DOI: | 10.3390/insects10090289 |