Loading…
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Non-pharmacological Intervention for Cancer-Related Dyspnea
To evaluate the efficacy of a brief tailored non-pharmacological intervention comprising breathing retraining and psychosocial support for managing dyspnea in cancer patients. Multicenter, single blinded, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. Four major public hospitals, Brisbane, Australia....
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in oncology 2020-12, Vol.10, p.591610-591610 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | To evaluate the efficacy of a brief tailored non-pharmacological intervention comprising breathing retraining and psychosocial support for managing dyspnea in cancer patients.
Multicenter, single blinded, parallel group, randomized controlled trial.
Four major public hospitals, Brisbane, Australia.
One hundred and forty four cancer patients, including 81 who received an 8-week tailored intervention and 63 who received standard care.
Diagnosis of small or non-small cell lung cancer, mesothelioma or lung metastases; completed first line therapy for the disease; average dyspnea rating >2 on (0-10) rating scale in past week; anticipated life expectancy ≥3 months.
The primary outcome measure was change in "worst" dyspnea at 8 weeks compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes were change in: dyspnea "at best" and "on average"; distress; perceived control over dyspnea; functional status, psychological distress; and use of non-pharmacological interventions to manage dyspnea at 8 weeks relative to baseline.
The mean age of participants was 67.9 (SD = 9.6) years. Compared to the control group, the intervention group demonstrated a statistically significant: (i) improvement in average dyspnea from T1(
= 4.5, SE = 0.22) to T3 (
= 3.6, SE = 0.24) vs. (
= 3.8, SE = 0.24) to (
= 4.1, SE = 0.26); (ii) greater control over dyspnea from T1 (
= 5.7, SE = 0.28) to T3 (
= 7.5, SE = 0.31) vs. (
= 6.8, SE = 0.32) to (
= 6.6, SE = 0.33); and (iii) greater reduction in anxiety from T1 (
= 5.4, SE = 0.43) to T3 (
= 4.5, SE = 0.45) vs. (
= 4.2, SE = 0.49) to (
= 4.6, SE = 0.50). This study found no intervention effect for best and worst dyspnea, distress from breathlessness, functional status, and depression over time.
This study demonstrates efficacy of tailored non-pharmacological interventions in improving dyspnea on average, control over dyspnea, and anxiety for cancer patients.
The trial is registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.anzctr.org.au). The registration number is ACTRN12607000087459. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2020.591610 |