Comparative analysis of the long-term effect of two families of high-flux polysulfone dialysers on platelet count: a retrospective cross-sectional study

• Published in: Therapeutics and clinical risk management 2017-01, Vol.13, p.1415-1422
• Main Authors: Del Giorno, Rosaria, Berwert, Lorenzo, Pianca, Silvio, Bianchi, Giorgia, Giannini, Olivier, Gabutti, Luca
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adsorption; Biocompatibility; Blood; Blood cell count; Blood platelets; Comparative Analysis; Complications and side effects; Cross-sectional studies; Data analysis; Data collection; Hematology; Hemodialysis; Hospitals; Internal medicine; Kidney diseases; Laboratories; Membranes; Nephrology; Original Research; Patients; Platelet Count; Polysulfone Membranes; Retrospective Pilot Study; Risk factors; Sulfones; Thrombocytopenia
• ISSN: 1176-6336; 1178-203X; 1178-203X
• DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S143708

Thrombocytopenia is a potential complication of hemodialysis (HD), and its occurrence has been described even with highly biocompatible polysulfone (PSf) membranes. Dialysis units routinely monitor platelet (PLT) count at the beginning of HD sessions. However, considering that the long-term effects on PLT count could easily be missed, the prevalence of HD-related thrombocytopenia could be underestimated. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the following: 1) the long-term impact of HD treatment on PLT count, comparing two families of dialysis membranes made up of similar PSfs; 2) whether the switch between the dialysis membranes studied significantly affects PLT count; and 3) the prevalence and the risk of HD-induced thrombocytopenia according to the dialysis membranes used. A cross-sectional retrospective study was performed comprising 157 adult chronic HD patients. The HD membranes under investigation were of the series FX, Helixone Fresenius (Filters A), and Polyflux Gambro (Filters B). Patients were treated in 4 dialysis units in Southern Switzerland. Data were collected from a centralized computing platform. PLT count significantly differs between Filters A and B with, respectively, 188 (153-243) ×10E9/L versus 214 (179-255) ×10E9/L ( =0.036). The prevalence of thrombocytopenia was higher for Filter A compared with Filter B (28.4% versus 12.8%;