The diagnostic utility of retroperitoneoscopic tissue biopsy for unresectable retroperitoneal lesions excluding urogenital cancers

• Published in: World journal of surgical oncology 2019-02, Vol.17 (1), p.35-35, Article 35
• Main Authors: Miyake, Makito, Fukui, Shinji, Gotoh, Daisuke, Matsumura, Yoshiaki, Samma, Shoji, Matsumoto, Yoshihiro, Momose, Hitoshi, Hori, Shunta, Watanabe, Shuji, Owari, Takuya, Morizawa, Yosuke, Itami, Yoshitaka, Nakai, Yasushi, Inoue, Takeshi, Anai, Satoshi, Torimoto, Kazumasa, Aoki, Katsuya, Tanaka, Nobumichi, Fujimoto, Kiyohide
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Benign; Biopsy; Cancer; Collaboration; Complication; Complications; Diagnosis; Diagnostic systems; Digestive system cancer; Endoscopy; Gastric cancer; Genital cancers; Histochemistry; Histopathology; Laparoscopy; Lesions; Literature reviews; Lymphoma; Lymphomas; Medical errors; Medical imaging; Needle biopsy; Neoplasia; Neoplasms; Pathology; Patients; Pelvis; Postoperative complications; Retroperitoneal tumor; Retroperitoneoscopy; Safety regulations; Studies; Surgery; Surgical outcomes; Tissues; Tumors; Ultrasonic imaging; Ureter; Urinoma
• ISSN: 1477-7819; 1477-7819
• DOI: 10.1186/s12957-019-1581-0

Retroperitoneal tumors are an uncommon disease known to consist of a diverse group of benign and malignant neoplasms. Treatment of unresectable retroperitoneal lesions requires pathological diagnosis. Here, we report the utility and safety of retroperitoneoscopic biopsy for unresectable retroperitoneal lesions excluding urogenital cancers. We analyzed 47 patients consisting of 23 (49%) and 24 (51%) cases that underwent retroperitoneoscopic tissue biopsy and open biopsy, respectively. The clinicopathological features, including postoperative complications, were compared between the two groups. Tumor pathology was diagnosed successfully with a single operation in all patients. Malignant pathology (68%) was more common than benign pathology (32%). The most common pathology was malignant lymphoma, which accounted for about 50% of all cases. There was no significant difference with respect to the age, sex, tumor size, presence of tumor-related symptom, histopathology, operative time, and complications. Three (13%) of 23 patients in the retroperitoneoscopic biopsy group received percutaneous needle biopsy before laparoscopic excisional biopsy because the evaluation of needle cores failed to confirm subclasses of diagnosed pathologies. One patient was converted to open surgery just after the initiation of operation due to severe adhesion of adjacent structures. We had two cases with iatrogenic urinoma due to ureteral injury after retroperitoneoscopic biopsy. We conclude that retroperitoneoscopic biopsy is a safe and useful tool for benign and malignant retroperitoneal lesions, in comparison to open biopsy. It is critical to carefully examine the preoperative imaging for the location of tumors, especially those close to the renal pelvis and ureter.