Loading…
Electrographic lead I and V5 monitoring could have detected a missed left‐side pneumothorax intraoperatively
We present an EKG monitoring strategy to detect pneumothorax during high‐risk surgery. In the literature, EKG changes and pneumothorax are well‐described. However, anesthesiologists only monitor lead II on a three‐lead EKG system in the operating room. In our case, there was only a subtle change in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology 2023-03, Vol.28 (2), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We present an EKG monitoring strategy to detect pneumothorax during high‐risk surgery. In the literature, EKG changes and pneumothorax are well‐described. However, anesthesiologists only monitor lead II on a three‐lead EKG system in the operating room. In our case, there was only a subtle change in lead II for a left‐sided pneumothorax, which could have been easily missed. On the contrary, there was a marked QRS amplitude reduction and T wave flattening/inversion in lead I and V5. We recommend lead V5 be added to the continuous monitoring and lead I be periodically checked for surgeries known to potentially cause pneumothorax.
Postoperative EKG showed a new right superior axis at 268 degrees and markedly reduced R wave amplitude in lateral leads I and aVL, and precordial leads V 2 through V 6. Also noted were T wave flattening/inversion in lead I, lead II and precordial leads Electrical alternans were most visible in V 6. These EKG findings were consistent with left‐sided pneumothorax. Stat chest X‐ray was ordered, which revealed a large left‐sided pneumothorax and a nearly total collapsed left lung. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1082-720X 1542-474X |
DOI: | 10.1111/anec.13017 |