Are We Prepared for the Inevitable? A Survey on Defining and Managing Failure in Face Transplantation

• Published in: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 2019-05, Vol.7 (5), p.e2055-e2055
• Main Authors: Lee, Z-Hye, Lopez, Christopher D., Plana, Natalie M., Caplan, Arthur L., Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original
• ISSN: 2169-7574; 2169-7574
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002055

BACKGROUND:Facial transplantation (FT) experience has grown but success in this innovative and complex field has yet to be defined. The purpose of this study is to determine attitudes regarding the failures in FT and the appropriate management of these failures. METHODS:An anonymous, 20-question survey elicited opinions regarding FT failure management. This survey was administered to attendees of 2 FT-focused national meetings. Demographics included sex, age, and personal/institutional FT experience. Attitudes related to FT recipient education, definition of FT failure, and management of complications were gathered. RESULTS:Eighty of 271 attendees completed the survey (29.5%). Respondents were predominantly male (81.3%) and 50 years of age or younger (80.5%). Thirty-eight percentage previously performed an FT and 53.8% were a part of an institution with a vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA)-related Institutional Review Board (IRB). Respondents almost unanimously agreed it was “absolutely essential” to discuss possibility of FT failure (93.8%), mortality (91.1%), and treatment for chronic rejection (78.8%). However, uncertainty of failure rate existed, with 56.4% citing failure rate as unknown, 25.6% citing 25%. 51.2% of those with direct FT experience lacked clear criteria for defining FT success or an institutional protocol for managing chronic rejection. 78.8% believed failed FT patients should be considered for retransplantation, but only about 25% cited functional concerns or esthetic dissatisfaction as appropriate indications. CONCLUSION:There is a lack of consensus regarding definition of FT failure and rates mortality amongst experts. Even institutions with FT experience lack protocols for managing chronic rejection. Expert consensus and institutional regulations surrounding these issues are warranted.