Affect-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression and anxiety through the Internet: a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2013-07, Vol.1 (1), p.e102-e102
• Main Authors: Johansson, Robert, Björklund, Martin, Hornborg, Christoffer, Karlsson, Stina, Hesser, Hugo, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Rousseau, Andréas, Frederick, Ronald J, Andersson, Gerhard
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Affect; Analysis; Anxiety; Care and treatment; Clinical Trials; Depression; e-health; Emotion; Evidence Based Medicine; Internet; Internet-delivered treatments; Mental depression; Mood; Motivation; Panic attacks; Psychiatry and Psychology; Psychodynamic therapy; Psychotherapy; Studies
• ISSN: 2167-8359; 2167-8359
• DOI: 10.7717/peerj.102

Background. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a psychological treatment approach that has a growing empirical base. Research has indicated an association between therapist-facilitated affective experience and outcome in psychodynamic therapy. Affect-phobia therapy (APT), as outlined by McCullough et al., is a psychodynamic treatment that emphasizes a strong focus on expression and experience of affect. This model has neither been evaluated for depression nor anxiety disorders in a randomized controlled trial. While Internet-delivered psychodynamic treatments for depression and generalized anxiety disorder exist, they have not been based on APT. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based, psychodynamic, guided self-help treatment based on APT for depression and anxiety disorders. Methods. One hundred participants with diagnoses of mood and anxiety disorders participated in a randomized (1:1 ratio) controlled trial of an active group versus a control condition. The treatment group received a 10-week, psychodynamic, guided self-help treatment based on APT that was delivered through the Internet. The treatment consisted of eight text-based treatment modules and included therapist contact (9.5 min per client and week, on average) in a secure online environment. Participants in the control group also received online therapist support and clinical monitoring of symptoms, but received no treatment modules. Outcome measures were the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). Process measures were also included. All measures were administered weekly during the treatment period and at a 7-month follow-up. Results. Mixed models analyses using the full intention-to-treat sample revealed significant interaction effects of group and time on all outcome measures, when comparing treatment to the control group. A large between-group effect size of Cohen's d = 0.77 (95% CI: 0.37-1.18) was found on the PHQ-9 and a moderately large between-group effect size d = 0.48 (95% CI: 0.08-0.87) was found on the GAD-7. The number of patients who recovered (had no diagnoses of depression and anxiety, and had less than 10 on both the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7) were at post-treatment 52% in the treatment group and 24% in the control group. This difference was significant, χ(2)(N = 100, d f = 1) = 8.3, p < .01. From post-treatment to follow-up, treatment gains were maint