The challenge of ensuring elderly people can access their health insurance entitlements: a mixed methods study on the Republic of Srpska’s Protector of Patients’ Health Insurance Entitlements

• Published in: BMJ global health 2022-09, Vol.7 (Suppl 6), p.e009373
• Main Authors: Stojisavljević, Stela, Đikanović, Bosiljka, Vončina, Luka, Scott, Kerry, Shroff, Zubin, Manigoda, Dijana, Štrbac, Savka, Bosančić, Borut, Mathauer, Inke
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Health care; Health care access; Health insurance; Health policy; Health services utilization; Mixed methods research; Older people; Original Research; Patients; Patients rights; Rural areas
• ISSN: 2059-7908; 2059-7908
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009373

IntroductionHealthcare utilisation requires knowing one’s entitlements and how to access them (navigation) and having access to grievance redressal when entitlements are denied. To ensure citizen access to and use of health insurance entitlements, the Health Insurance Fund established an initiative called the Protector of Patients’ Health Insurance Entitlements (PPHIE). PPHIEs are supposed to provide patient navigation and grievance redressal services. This paper explores to what extent this initiative meets its objectives and is used by the elderly in rural areas.MethodsThis study employed a mixed methods approach. We conducted in-depth interviews with elderly patients in rural areas, PPHIEs, health providers and health insurance managers (N=39), as well as focus groups (N=5) and a household survey (N=715) with elderly rural patients. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis, and the household survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe majority of elderly patients were not aware of the PPHIE initiative and instead received patient navigation support from their healthcare providers. The PPHIE programme was poorly publicised among the population. Although PPHIEs had a mandate to pursue grievance redressal they rarely did so, and their role in the system was more symbolic than functional.ConclusionWhile healthcare providers have (by default) filled the navigation role left by inactive PPHIEs, the grievance redressal role remains unfilled. Information about health insurance entitlements and access to grievance redressal must be provided through visible, accessible and efficient mechanisms that should be continuously monitored and improved.