Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia

Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique. Effective sedation is an essential for regional techniques too. This study compares midazolam and propofol in terms of onset & recovery from sedation, dosage and side effects of both the drugs using Bispectral Index monitoring....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of anaesthesia 2009-11, Vol.53 (6), p.662-666
Main Authors: Khurana, Priyanka, Agarwal, Ankit, Verma, Rk, Gupta, Pk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anesthesia
Blood pressure
Clinical Investigation
Health aspects
Heart rate
Midazolam
Propofol
Regional anesthesia
Sedation
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 666
container_issue 6
container_start_page 662
container_title Indian journal of anaesthesia
container_volume 53
creator Khurana, Priyanka
Agarwal, Ankit
Verma, Rk
Gupta, Pk
description Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique. Effective sedation is an essential for regional techniques too. This study compares midazolam and propofol in terms of onset & recovery from sedation, dosage and side effects of both the drugs using Bispectral Index monitoring. Ninety eight patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group recieved midazolam infusion while the other recieved propofol infusion until BIS reached 75. We observed Time to reach desired sedation, HR, MABP, time for recovery, dose to reach sedation and for maintenance of sedation and side effects if any. The time to reach required sedation was 11 min in Midazolam group(Group I) while it was 6 min in Propofol group(Group II) (p=0.0). Fall in MABP was greater with propofol. Recovery in with midazolam was slower than with propofol (18.6 +/- 6.5 vs 10.10+/-3.65 min) (p=0.00). We concluded that both midazolam and propofol are effective sedatives, but onset and offset was quicker with propofol, while midazolam was more cardiostable.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4c45c6aea88491fbfdf9ad85c412503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A224381743</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e4c45c6aea88491fbfdf9ad85c412503</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A224381743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d396t-412f798744025a78d49719cadc5460e9c80a4c45aa2617a60a92326b6e54274a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CzJ4oVcjmSSTjxthXbUutChWwbvhbD5ms2SSNZkR9NebddvSlZKLJCfvec7hPXlUnSHJWYNFyx-XM2pl0yEqT6unOW8RIpgw9qQ6xYhRhCQ5q34s47iD5HIMdbT1ldPwJ3oYawi6_pLiLtroaxtT_W513VzMThtdXxsNkysZ7-fkwlB_NUO5ga8XAUyeNiY7eFadWPDZPL_Zz6vvHz98W35qLj9frJaLy0YTyaaGtthyKTilCHfAhaaSt1KBVh1lyEglEFBFOwDMWg4MgcQEszUzHcWcAjmvVgeujrDtd8mNkH73EVz_LxDT0EOanPKmN3uQYmBACCpbu7baStCiU6WLDpHCentg7eb1aLQyYUrgj6DHL8Ft-iH-6rFECPGuAF7fAFL8ORcr-tFlZbyHYOKce06IFFJQVJQv_1Nu45yKh7kXHRcECSaLqDmIBijtu2BjqaoGE0wpHoOxroQXGFNS5k33_b95QF-WNqNTDya8upewMeCnTY5-3g83Hwtf3HfmzpLbj0T-AtZ_wrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>857830869</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Khurana, Priyanka ; Agarwal, Ankit ; Verma, Rk ; Gupta, Pk</creator><creatorcontrib>Khurana, Priyanka ; Agarwal, Ankit ; Verma, Rk ; Gupta, Pk</creatorcontrib><description>Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique. Effective sedation is an essential for regional techniques too. This study compares midazolam and propofol in terms of onset &amp; recovery from sedation, dosage and side effects of both the drugs using Bispectral Index monitoring. Ninety eight patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group recieved midazolam infusion while the other recieved propofol infusion until BIS reached 75. We observed Time to reach desired sedation, HR, MABP, time for recovery, dose to reach sedation and for maintenance of sedation and side effects if any. The time to reach required sedation was 11 min in Midazolam group(Group I) while it was 6 min in Propofol group(Group II) (p=0.0). Fall in MABP was greater with propofol. Recovery in with midazolam was slower than with propofol (18.6 +/- 6.5 vs 10.10+/-3.65 min) (p=0.00). We concluded that both midazolam and propofol are effective sedatives, but onset and offset was quicker with propofol, while midazolam was more cardiostable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-5049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0976-2817</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20640093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Blood pressure ; Clinical Investigation ; Health aspects ; Heart rate ; Midazolam ; Propofol ; Regional anesthesia ; Sedation</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2009-11, Vol.53 (6), p.662-666</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt Ltd Nov 2009</rights><rights>Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900075/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/857830869?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20640093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khurana, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Rk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pk</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia</title><title>Indian journal of anaesthesia</title><addtitle>Indian J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique. Effective sedation is an essential for regional techniques too. This study compares midazolam and propofol in terms of onset &amp; recovery from sedation, dosage and side effects of both the drugs using Bispectral Index monitoring. Ninety eight patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group recieved midazolam infusion while the other recieved propofol infusion until BIS reached 75. We observed Time to reach desired sedation, HR, MABP, time for recovery, dose to reach sedation and for maintenance of sedation and side effects if any. The time to reach required sedation was 11 min in Midazolam group(Group I) while it was 6 min in Propofol group(Group II) (p=0.0). Fall in MABP was greater with propofol. Recovery in with midazolam was slower than with propofol (18.6 +/- 6.5 vs 10.10+/-3.65 min) (p=0.00). We concluded that both midazolam and propofol are effective sedatives, but onset and offset was quicker with propofol, while midazolam was more cardiostable.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Clinical Investigation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Midazolam</subject><subject>Propofol</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Sedation</subject><issn>0019-5049</issn><issn>0976-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgex2Fr9CzJ4oVcjmSSTjxthXbUutChWwbvhbD5ms2SSNZkR9NebddvSlZKLJCfvec7hPXlUnSHJWYNFyx-XM2pl0yEqT6unOW8RIpgw9qQ6xYhRhCQ5q34s47iD5HIMdbT1ldPwJ3oYawi6_pLiLtroaxtT_W513VzMThtdXxsNkysZ7-fkwlB_NUO5ga8XAUyeNiY7eFadWPDZPL_Zz6vvHz98W35qLj9frJaLy0YTyaaGtthyKTilCHfAhaaSt1KBVh1lyEglEFBFOwDMWg4MgcQEszUzHcWcAjmvVgeujrDtd8mNkH73EVz_LxDT0EOanPKmN3uQYmBACCpbu7baStCiU6WLDpHCentg7eb1aLQyYUrgj6DHL8Ft-iH-6rFECPGuAF7fAFL8ORcr-tFlZbyHYOKce06IFFJQVJQv_1Nu45yKh7kXHRcECSaLqDmIBijtu2BjqaoGE0wpHoOxroQXGFNS5k33_b95QF-WNqNTDya8upewMeCnTY5-3g83Hwtf3HfmzpLbj0T-AtZ_wrk</recordid><startdate>20091101</startdate><enddate>20091101</enddate><creator>Khurana, Priyanka</creator><creator>Agarwal, Ankit</creator><creator>Verma, Rk</creator><creator>Gupta, Pk</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20091101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia</title><author>Khurana, Priyanka ; Agarwal, Ankit ; Verma, Rk ; Gupta, Pk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d396t-412f798744025a78d49719cadc5460e9c80a4c45aa2617a60a92326b6e54274a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Clinical Investigation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Midazolam</topic><topic>Propofol</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Sedation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khurana, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Ankit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verma, Rk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Pk</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of anaesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khurana, Priyanka</au><au>Agarwal, Ankit</au><au>Verma, Rk</au><au>Gupta, Pk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of anaesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2009-11-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>662-666</pages><issn>0019-5049</issn><eissn>0976-2817</eissn><abstract>Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique. Effective sedation is an essential for regional techniques too. This study compares midazolam and propofol in terms of onset &amp; recovery from sedation, dosage and side effects of both the drugs using Bispectral Index monitoring. Ninety eight patients were randomly divided into two groups,one group recieved midazolam infusion while the other recieved propofol infusion until BIS reached 75. We observed Time to reach desired sedation, HR, MABP, time for recovery, dose to reach sedation and for maintenance of sedation and side effects if any. The time to reach required sedation was 11 min in Midazolam group(Group I) while it was 6 min in Propofol group(Group II) (p=0.0). Fall in MABP was greater with propofol. Recovery in with midazolam was slower than with propofol (18.6 +/- 6.5 vs 10.10+/-3.65 min) (p=0.00). We concluded that both midazolam and propofol are effective sedatives, but onset and offset was quicker with propofol, while midazolam was more cardiostable.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>20640093</pmid><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-5049
ispartof Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2009-11, Vol.53 (6), p.662-666
issn 0019-5049
0976-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4c45c6aea88491fbfdf9ad85c412503
source Publicly Available Content Database; Medknow Open Access Medical Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesia
Blood pressure
Clinical Investigation
Health aspects
Heart rate
Midazolam
Propofol
Regional anesthesia
Sedation
title Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol for BIS-Guided Sedation During Regional Anaesthesia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A38%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Midazolam%20and%20Propofol%20for%20BIS-Guided%20Sedation%20During%20Regional%20Anaesthesia&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia&rft.au=Khurana,%20Priyanka&rft.date=2009-11-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=662-666&rft.issn=0019-5049&rft.eissn=0976-2817&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA224381743%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d396t-412f798744025a78d49719cadc5460e9c80a4c45aa2617a60a92326b6e54274a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=857830869&rft_id=info:pmid/20640093&rft_galeid=A224381743&rfr_iscdi=true