Improving Urban Land Cover Classification in Cloud-Prone Areas with Polarimetric SAR Images

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-11, Vol.13 (22), p.4708
• Main Authors: Ling, Jing, Zhang, Hongsheng, Lin, Yinyi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Accuracy; Classification; Clouds; Contamination; Data integration; Decision making; Environmental impact; Environmental information; Environmental studies; Image classification; Land cover; Mapping; optical and SAR fusion; Reduction; Remote sensing; Synthetic aperture radar; urban land cover; Urban studies
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs13224708

Urban land cover (ULC) serves as fundamental environmental information for urban studies, while accurate and timely ULC mapping remains challenging due to cloud contamination in tropical and subtropical areas. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has excellent all-weather working capability to overcome the challenge, while optical SAR data fusion is often required due to the limited land surface information provided by SAR. However, the mechanism by which SAR can compensate optical images, given the occurrence of clouds, in order to improve the ULC mapping, remains unexplored. To address the issue, this study proposes a framework, through various sampling strategies and three typical supervised classification methods, to quantify the ULC classification accuracy using optical and SAR data with various cloud levels. The land cover confusions were investigated in detail to understand the role of SAR in distinguishing land cover under different types of cloud coverage. Several interesting experimental results were found. First, 50% cloud coverage over the optical images decreased the overall accuracy by 10–20%, while the incorporation of SAR images was able to improve the overall accuracy by approximately 4%, by increasing the recognition of cloud-covered ULC information, particularly the water bodies. Second, if all the training samples were not contaminated by clouds, the cloud coverage had a higher impact with a reduction of 35% in the overall accuracy, whereas the incorporation of SAR data contributed to an increase of approximately 5%. Third, the thickness of clouds also brought about different impacts on the results, with an approximately 10% higher reduction from thick clouds compared with that from thin clouds, indicating that certain spectral information might still be available in the areas covered by thin clouds. These findings provide useful references for the accurate monitoring of ULC over cloud-prone areas, such as tropical and subtropical cities, where cloud contamination is often unavoidable.