Loading…

Vadose zone flushing of fertilizer tracked by isotopes of water and nitrate

A substantial fraction of nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied in agricultural systems is not incorporated into crops and moves below the rooting zone as nitrate (NO3−). Understanding mechanisms for soil N retention below the rooting zone and leaching to groundwater is essential for our ability to track...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vadose zone journal 2024-05, Vol.23 (3), p.e20324-n/a
Main Authors: Weitzman, Julie N., Brooks, J. Renée, Compton, Jana E., Faulkner, Barton R., Peachey, R. Edward, Rugh, William D., Coulombe, Robert A., Hatteberg, Blake, Hutchins, Stephen R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A substantial fraction of nitrogen (N) fertilizer applied in agricultural systems is not incorporated into crops and moves below the rooting zone as nitrate (NO3−). Understanding mechanisms for soil N retention below the rooting zone and leaching to groundwater is essential for our ability to track the fate of added N. We used dual stable isotopes of nitrate (δ15N–NO3− and δ18O–NO3−) and water (δ18O–H2O and δ2H–H2O) to understand the mechanisms driving nitrate leaching at three depths (0.8, 1.5, and 3.0 m) of an irrigated corn field sampled every 2 weeks from 2016 to 2020 in the southern Willamette Valley, Oregon, USA. Distinct periods of high nitrate concentrations with lower δ15N–NO3− values indicated that a portion of that nitrate was from recent fertilizer applications. We used a mixing model to quantify nitrate fluxes associated with recently added fertilizer N versus older, legacy soil N during these “fertilizer signal periods.” Nitrate leached below 3.0 m in these periods made up a larger proportion of the total N leached at that depth (∼52%) versus the two shallower depths (∼13%–16%), indicating preferential movement of recently applied fertilizer N through the deep soil into groundwater. Further, N associated with recent fertilizer additions leached more easily when compared to remobilized legacy N. A high volume of fall and winter precipitation may push residual fertilizer N to depth, potentially posing a larger threat to groundwater than legacy N. Optimizing fertilizer N additions could minimize fertilizer losses and reduce nitrate leaching to groundwater. Core Ideas A total of 11% (22.7 kg N·ha−1·year−1) of recently applied fertilizer was leached below 3 m with the onset of fall rain. Processed legacy nitrogen (N) comprised up to 18% (32.8 kg N·ha−1·year−1) of nitrate lost to leaching. Denitrification was not an important process contributing to N removal. Residual fertilizer N posed a greater immediate threat to groundwater than soil legacy N. N sources and potential processing information can link soil surface practices with nitrate leaching.
ISSN:1539-1663
1539-1663
DOI:10.1002/vzj2.20324