Arterial stiffness assessment in coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An initial report from the WISE-CVD continuation study

• Published in: American heart journal plus 2024-05, Vol.41, p.100390-100390, Article 100390
• Main Authors: Rezaeian, P., Shufelt, C.L., Wei, J., Pacheco, C., Cook-Wiens, G., Berman, D., Tamarappoo, B., Thomson, L.E., Nelson, M.D., Anderson, R.D., Petersen, J., Handberg, E.M., Pepine, C.J., Merz, C.N. Bairey
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Diastolic function; Heart failure with preserve ejection fraction; Pulse wave velocity; Research Paper
• ISSN: 2666-6022; 2666-6022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100390

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common cardiac complication in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), yet its underlying pathways remain unclear. Aortic pulse-wave velocity (aPWV) is an indicator of large artery stiffness and a predictor for cardiovascular disease. However, aPWV in CMD and HFpEF is not well characterized and may provide understanding of disease progression. Among participants without obstructive coronary artery disease, we evaluated 51 women with suspected CMD and 20 women and men with evidence of HFpEF. All participants underwent aPWV measurement (SphygmoCor, Atcor Medical) with higher aPWV indicating greater vascular stiffness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) assessed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, CMD via myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), and ventricular remodeling via LV mass-volume ratio. . Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson correlations and linear regression analysis. Compared to the suspected CMD group, the HFpEF participants were older (65 ± 12 vs 56 ± 11 yrs., p = 0.002) had higher BMI (31.0 ± 4.3 vs 27.8 ± 6.7 kg/m2, p = 0.013), higher aPWV (10.5 ± 2.0 vs 8.0 ± 1.6 m/s, p = 0.05) and lower MPRI (1.5 ± 0.3 vs1.8 ± 0.3, p = 0.02), but not remodeling. In a model adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, the HFpEF group had a lower LVEF (estimate −4.78, p = 0.0437) than the suspected CMD group. HFpEF participants exhibit greater arterial stiffness and lower myocardial perfusion reserve, with lower LVEF albeit not remodeling, compared to suspected CMD participants. These findings suggest arterial stiffness may contribute to progression from CMD to HFpEF. Prospective work is needed and ongoing.