Loading…

GPS-SBAS-Based Orbit Determination for Low Earth Orbiting Satellites

A space-based augmentation system (SBAS) provides real-time GNSS correction signals via geostationary satellites for near-ground GNSS users. To use the SBAS correction for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the correction, especially the ionosphere correction, must be adjusted for the LEO altitude. W...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of aerospace engineering 2023-10, Vol.2023, p.1-9
Main Authors: Kim, Mingyu, Kim, Jeongrae
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A space-based augmentation system (SBAS) provides real-time GNSS correction signals via geostationary satellites for near-ground GNSS users. To use the SBAS correction for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites, the correction, especially the ionosphere correction, must be adjusted for the LEO altitude. We apply modified SBAS data to LEO satellite onboard navigator to improve the positioning accuracy of a LEO satellite for possible real-time use. The onboard navigator requires high positioning reliability, and code pseudoranges, rather than phase pseudoranges, are used for the primary measurements. The Galileo NeQuick G model is used to determine the real-time conversion factor of the SBAS ionosphere correction for a LEO satellite. The GPS L1 data from GRACE satellite are combined with the SBAS data from the ground receiver. The onboard navigator combines the precise satellite dynamic model with an extended Kalman filter to improve positioning accuracy and stability. The kinematic positioning method, which uses the weighted least square method without the dynamic model, is also performed for comparison. The SBAS correction reduces the positioning error in both the kinematic positioning and the dynamic positioning. The positioning error reduction of the GPS and WAAS case over the GPS-only case is 25.2% for the kinematic method and 30.6% for the dynamic method. In the case of the dynamic method with the SBAS corrections, the positioning error remains smaller than that of the GPS-only dynamic method even after the satellite has left the SBAS service area.
ISSN:1687-5966
1687-5974
DOI:10.1155/2023/3033205