Loading…

Non-covalent interactions between rice protein and three polyphenols and potential application in emulsions

•Interactions between RP and polyphenols and performance in emulsions are studied.•QUE, CUR, and RES can interact with RP non-covalently with decreasing binding strength.•Type of polyphenol affect physicochemical properties and conformation of formed complexes.•Interaction with polyphenols improve p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food Chemistry: X 2024-06, Vol.22, p.101459-101459, Article 101459
Main Authors: Huang, Xin, Xia, Boxue, Liu, Yaxuan, Wang, Cuina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Interactions between RP and polyphenols and performance in emulsions are studied.•QUE, CUR, and RES can interact with RP non-covalently with decreasing binding strength.•Type of polyphenol affect physicochemical properties and conformation of formed complexes.•Interaction with polyphenols improve physical and lipid oxidation stability of RP coated emulsions. Rice protein (RP) and polyphenols are often used in functional foods. This study investigated the non-covalent interactions between RP and three polyphenols (curcumin, CUR; quercetin, QUE; resveratrol, RES) and used the complexes as emulsifiers to create emulsions. Three polyphenols interacted with RP to varying extents, with QUE showing the greatest binding affinity and inducing the greatest alterations in its secondary structure. Molecular docking analysis elucidated the driving forces between them including hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and van der Waals forces. Combination with QUE or RES induced structural changes of RP, increasing particle size of complexes. The synergistic effect of polyphenols and protein also enhanced radical scavenging capacity of complexes. Compared to pure protein, all complexes successfully created emulsions with smaller particle size (378–395 nm vs. 470 nm), higher absolute potential (37.43–38.26 mV vs. 35.62 mV), and greater lipid oxidation stability by altering protein conformation.
ISSN:2590-1575
2590-1575
DOI:10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101459