Long-term Home Mechanical Ventilation of Children in İstanbul

• Published in: Thoracic research and practice 2025-01, Vol.26 (1), p.25-31
• Main Authors: Yanaz, Mürüvvet, Ünal, Füsun, Hepkaya, Evrim, Yazan, Hakan, Can Oksay, Sinem, Köstereli, Ebru, Yılmaz Yeğit, Cansu, Başkan, Azer Kılıç, Onay, Zeynep Reyhan, Gulieva, Aynur, Soyyiğit, Aslınur, Kalyoncu, Mine, Küçük, Hanife Büşra, Ayhan, Yetkin, Ergenekon, Almala Pınar, Atağ, Emine, Uzuner, Selçuk, Baş İkizoğlu, Nilay, Ayzıt Kılınç, Ayşe, Ay, Pınar, Erdem Eralp, Ela, Öktem, Sedat, Çakır, Erkan, Girit, Saniye, Uyan, Zeynep Seda, Çokuğraş, Haluk, Ersu, Refika, Karadağ, Bülent, Karakoç, Fazilet
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: chronic respiratory failure; long-term home mechanical ventilation; neuromuscular disorders; non-invasive ventilation
• ISSN: 2979-9139; 2979-9139
• DOI: 10.4274/ThoracResPract.2024.24042

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this multi-center study were to describe the characteristics of children receiving long-term home mechanical ventilation (HMV) in İstanbul and to compare the patients receiving non-invasive and invasive ventilation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study included all children receiving long-term HMV followed by admission to six tertiary hospitals. The data were collected between May 2020 and May 2021. Demographic data and data regarding HMV were collected from the patient charts. RESULTS: The study included 416 participants. The most common diagnoses were neuromuscular (35.1%) and neurological diseases (25.7%). Among the patients, 49.5% (n = 206) received non-invasive ventilation (NIV), whereas 50.5% (n = 210) received invasive ventilation. The median age at initiation was significantly younger in the invasive ventilation group than in the NIV group (10 vs. 41 months, P < 0.001). Most subjects in the NIV group (81.1%) received ventilation support only during sleep, whereas most subjects in the invasive ventilation group (55.7%) received continuous ventilator support (P < 0.001). In addition to ventilation support, 41.9% of the subjects in the invasive ventilation group and 28.6% in the NIV group received oxygen supplementation (P = 0.002). Within the last year, 59.1% (n = 246) of the subjects were hospitalized. The risk factors for hospitalization were invasive ventilation, continuous ventilatory support, oxygen supplementation, tube feeding, and swallowing dysfunction (P = 0.002, 0.009,