Loading…

Estimating evaporation in semi-arid areas facing data scarcity: Example of the El Haouareb dam (Merguellil catchment, Central Tunisia)

The El Haouareb dam (Merguellil catchment) in central Tunisia, which is typical of semi-arid environments. Most estimates of evaporation from water bodies located in semi-arid environments suffer from the lack of data, or biased field measurements. It is thus important for hydrologists to assess the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrology. Regional studies 2015-03, Vol.3, p.265-284
Main Authors: Alazard, M., Leduc, C., Travi, Y., Boulet, G., Ben Salem, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The El Haouareb dam (Merguellil catchment) in central Tunisia, which is typical of semi-arid environments. Most estimates of evaporation from water bodies located in semi-arid environments suffer from the lack of data, or biased field measurements. It is thus important for hydrologists to assess the relative performance of the various available methods used to estimate this water loss, as well as their uncertainties. We confronted physical approaches based on contrasted theoretical formulae (Dalton, simplified BREB, Penman) and geochemical approaches based on mass conservation (stable isotopes and chloride). We compared the results with Colorado pan measurements, and tested the methods’ sensitivity to various physical parameters and data gaps. In this region, where mean annual rainfall is 300mm, estimates of evaporation of the El Haouareb Dam lake ranged from 1400 to 1900mma−1, depending on the method and the year. The Penman approach was found to be the most robust and gave an annual mean of 1600mma−1. Evaporation values were refined by combining results from the different methods. Mean interannual evaporation was estimated to be 1700mma−1, with an uncertainty of 15%. From this work, we propose an annual Colorado pan conversion coefficient of 0.8 which can be adjusted, 1.0 for spring and 0.76 for the rest of the year.
ISSN:2214-5818
2214-5818
DOI:10.1016/j.ejrh.2014.11.007