Effect of formic acid treatment on colostrum quality, and on absorption and function of immunoglobulins: a randomized controlled trial in Holstein dairy calves

• Published in: BMC veterinary research 2022-08, Vol.18 (1), p.1-318, Article 318
• Main Authors: Smith, Billy I, Cady, Sarah V, Aceto, Helen W
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acidification; Acidified Colostrum; Analysis; Bacteria; Bovine rhinotracheitis; Cattle; Colostrum; Contamination; Dairy industry; Diarrhea; Disease prevention; Diseases; Dosage and administration; Formic acid; Genetic aspects; Growth; Holstein-Friesian cattle; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulins; Milk; Pathogen Load, Neutralizing Capability; Pathogens; pH effects; Proteins; Randomized Controlled Trial
• ISSN: 1746-6148; 1746-6148
• DOI: 10.1186/s12917-022-03418-x

Background Good quality colostrum is characterized by high immunoglobulin concentration and low pathogen load. Some methods of pathogen reduction can decrease immunoglobulin concentration and potentially affect their function. Objectives were to determine the effect of formic acid treatment on colostral bacterial and immunoglobulin (IgG) levels before feeding, and serum immunoglobulin concentration and neutralizing capabilities after feeding. Fifteen female Holstein calf pairs born < 12 h apart from different dams were randomly assigned to receive four liters of either untreated pooled (both dams) colostrum (MC) or colostrum acidified to pH 4.0-4.5 (AC). Colostrum characteristics estimated; pH, bacterial load, IgG concentration, and neutralization of Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis (IBRV/BoHV-1), Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVDV) Types 1 and 2. Blood samples were collected on days 1, 3 and monthly for 6 months and were analyzed for IgG, and both viral plus leptospiral neutralization, and total protein (day 3 only). Results Compared to MC (mean 6.7, SD 0.4; median 6.8, range 6.0-7.3), AC pH was significantly reduced (mean 4.3, SD 0.2; median 4.3, range 4.0-4.5; P < 0.001). Total coliform count (cfu/mL) was also reduced (MC mean 149, SD 444; median 1, range 0-1,700; AC mean 8, SD 31; median 0, range 0-120; P = 0.02). Colostrum IgG concentration was not significantly different between MC (mean 93.3, SD 39.7; median 92.8, range 36.7-164.4 g/L) and AC (mean 101.9, SD 36.7; median 108.3, range 33.8-164.4 g/L; P = 0.54). In calves, serum IgG peaked on day 3 (MC mean 26.1, SD 34.9; median 169.2, range 8.3-151.0 g/L; AC mean 30.2, SD 48.7; median 188.8, range 3.1-204.4 g/L; P = 0.77), and apparent efficiency of IgG absorption was not different between groups (MC mean 24.3, SD 11.4, median 25.3, range 8.6-51.3%; AC mean 22.6, SD 21.7, median 21.6, range 4.1-58.9%; P = 0.65). Thereafter, IgG levels declined but did not differ between groups. MC and AC serum neutralizing titers for IBRV, BVDV Types 1 and 2, or Leptospira interrogans serovars Canicola, and Pomona and L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo were not different. Conclusions Colostrum acidification significantly decreased bacterial load fed to newborn calves without affecting colostral IgG concentration or virus neutralization. In addition, acid treatment did not affect serum IgG concentration in calves or its activity against common pathogens. Keywords: Randomized Controlled Trial, Acidified Colostrum, Pathogen Loa