Loading…

Adjunctive Volasertib in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia not Eligible for Standard Induction Therapy: A Randomized, Phase 3 Trial

In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo‐like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4‐wk cycles), combined with low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:HemaSphere 2021-08, Vol.5 (8), p.e617-n/a
Main Authors: Döhner, Hartmut, Symeonidis, Argiris, Deeren, Dries, Demeter, Judit, Sanz, Miguel A., Anagnostopoulos, Achilles, Esteve, Jordi, Fiedler, Walter, Porkka, Kimmo, Kim, Hee‐Je, Lee, Je‐Hwan, Usuki, Kensuke, D'Ardia, Stefano, Won Jung, Chul, Salamero, Olga, Horst, Heinz‐August, Recher, Christian, Rousselot, Philippe, Sandhu, Irwindeep, Theunissen, Koen, Thol, Felicitas, Döhner, Konstanze, Teleanu, Veronica, DeAngelo, Daniel J., Naoe, Tomoki, Sekeres, Mikkael A., Belsack, Valerie, Ge, Miaomiao, Taube, Tillmann, Ottmann, Oliver G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this phase 3 trial, older patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive the polo‐like kinase inhibitor, volasertib (V; 350 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 in 4‐wk cycles), combined with low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC; 20 mg subcutaneous, twice daily, days 1–10; n = 444), or LDAC plus placebo (P; n = 222). Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Primary ORR analysis at recruitment completion included patients randomized ≥5 months beforehand; ORR was 25.2% for V+LDAC and 16.8% for P+LDAC (n = 371; odds ratio 1.66 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.95–2.89]; P = 0.071). At final analysis (≥574 OS events), median OS was 5.6 months for V+LDAC and 6.5 months for P+LDAC (n = 666; hazard ratio 0.97 [95% CI, 0.8–1.2]; P = 0.757). The most common adverse events (AEs) were infections/infestations (grouped term; V+LDAC, 81.3%; P+LDAC, 63.5%) and febrile neutropenia (V+LDAC, 60.4%; P+LDAC, 29.3%). Fatal AEs occurred in 31.2% with V+LDAC versus 18.0% with P+LDAC, most commonly infections/infestations (V+LDAC, 17.1%; P+LDAC, 6.3%). Lack of OS benefit with V+LDAC versus P+LDAC may reflect increased early mortality with V+LDAC from myelosuppression and infections.
ISSN:2572-9241
2572-9241
DOI:10.1097/HS9.0000000000000617