Evaluating carotid and aortic peak velocity variation as an alternative index for stroke volume and pulse pressure variation: a method comparison study

• Published in: WFUMB Ultrasound Open 2023-06, Vol.1 (1), p.100001, Article 100001
• Main Authors: van Houte, Joris, de Boer, Esmée C., van Knippenberg, Luuk, Suriani, Irene, Meesters, Michaël I., Meijs, Loek P.B., Montenij, Leon J., Bouwman, Arthur R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Carotid Doppler ultrasound; Left ventricular outflow tract; Passive leg raise; Peak velocity variation; Pulse pressure variation; Stroke volume variation
• ISSN: 2949-6683; 2949-6683
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wfumbo.2023.100001

The peak velocity variation within the carotid artery (ΔVpeakCCA) and left ventricular outflow tract (ΔVpeakLVOT) is derived from the pulsed wave Doppler waveform and may predict fluid responsiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate ΔVpeakCCA and ΔVpeakLVOT against calibrated stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PVV). Therefore, eighteen cardiac surgery patients were included in this prospective observational study. Doppler measurements were performed after induction of anesthesia, after a passive leg raise, and at the end of surgery. Simultaneously, SVV and PPV were measured by pulse-contour-analysis (PiCCO). The correlation, methodological agreement, concordance, and clinical agreement between Doppler and PiCCO measurements were assessed. The correlation between SVV and ΔVpeakCCA was strong (ρ = 0.88). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a bias of 0.01%, and LOA +/− 4.6%, acceptable concordance (93%), and close to acceptable clinical agreement (88%). For PPV and ΔVpeakCCA correlation was also strong (ρ = 0.73), bias was −0.2%, LOA +/− 7.6%, with intermediate acceptable concordance (90%), and low clinical agreement (72%). Analysis of ΔVpeakLVOT measurements demonstrated poor statistical agreement with SVV and PPV. In conclusion, in cardiac surgery patients ΔVpeakCCA, as opposed to ΔVpeakLVOT, has acceptable statistical and clinical agreement with SVV measurements. ΔVpeakCCA may qualify as a potential tool for non-invasive assessment of fluid responsiveness.