Loading…

Alcohol consumption as a predictor of the progression of spinal structural damage in axial spondyloarthritis: data from the Catholic Axial Spondyloarthritis COhort (CASCO)

The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate whether alcohol consumption could predict spinal structural damage in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a prospective cohort study. AxSpA patients were enrolled from a single tertiary hospital in a prospective cohort. Baseline data were collected,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Arthritis research & therapy 2019-08, Vol.21 (1), p.187-187, Article 187
Main Authors: Min, Hong Ki, Lee, Jennifer, Ju, Ji Hyeon, Park, Sung-Hwan, Kwok, Seung-Ki
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate whether alcohol consumption could predict spinal structural damage in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a prospective cohort study. AxSpA patients were enrolled from a single tertiary hospital in a prospective cohort. Baseline data were collected, and 2-year follow-up radiographic data were collected. We analyzed the progression of spinal structural damage in 278 axSpA patients and grouped them into alcohol drinkers and non-drinkers. Baseline and follow-up characteristics were compared between the two groups. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to reveal predictors of spinal structural damage. Changes in modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) and syndesmophyte count over the 2-year period were more prominent in the alcohol drinker group than in the non-drinker group (2.7 ± 3.6 vs 1.5 ± 2.8, P = 0.007, 0.9 ± 1.3 vs 0.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.003). The alcohol drinker group showed more frequent significant mSASSS changes (≥ 2 units for 2 years follow-up) and new syndesmophyte/progression of pre-existing syndesmophytes than the non-drinker group (60.7% vs 29.2%, P 
ISSN:1478-6362
1478-6354
1478-6362
DOI:10.1186/s13075-019-1970-3