Studying additive effects of combining rTMS with cognitive control training: a pilot investigation

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an effective treatment for depression, that has been proposed to work via enhancement of cognitive control. Cognitive control training (CCT) can also alleviate depression by relying on DL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in human neuroscience 2023-07, Vol.17, p.1201344-1201344
Main Authors: Dalhuisen, Iris, Schutte, Céline, Bramson, Bob, Roelofs, Karin, Eijndhoven, Philip van, Tendolkar, Indira
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive ability
cognitive control training
depression
Emotional regulation
Human Neuroscience
Magnetic fields
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mental depression
Mood
mood induction
Neural networks
neuronavigation
Prefrontal cortex
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is an effective treatment for depression, that has been proposed to work via enhancement of cognitive control. Cognitive control training (CCT) can also alleviate depression by relying on DLPFC activation. As the additive effects of rTMS and CCT are unclear we set out to conduct a within-subject pilot study in healthy controls. Methods: Seventeen participants received two sessions of individualized resting-state connectivity-guided high-frequency rTMS, whilst randomly performing CCT or a control task. After each session, a negative mood was induced. Results: We found effects on mood and cognitive control after rTMS + CCT as well as rTMS + control, which were indiscriminative between conditions. Given the moderate evidence for the absence of an effect these results provide sufficient ground to not perform a full study. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate no differential effects of single sessions combining rTMS and CCT in a healthy population, even with the methodological improvement of individualized neuronavigation. The improvement in cognitive control seen in both conditions could indicate that a simple cognitive task is sufficient when studying additive rTMS effects. Future studies should focus on augmenting effects of various cognitive tasks, and compare the present interventions with rTMS or cognitive task alone.
ISSN:1662-5161
1662-5161
DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201344