Exploiting DNA repair defects in triple negative breast cancer to improve cell killing

• Published in: Therapeutic advances in medical oncology 2020, Vol.12, p.1758835920958354-1758835920958354
• Main Authors: Lee, Kevin J., Mann, Elise, Wright, Griffin, Piett, Cortt G., Nagel, Zachary D., Gassman, Natalie R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breast cancer; Cancer therapies; Carboplatin; Chemotherapy; CHK1 protein; Defects; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA damage; DNA repair; Doxorubicin; ERCC1 protein; Gene expression; Host cell reactivation; Metastases; Nucleotide excision repair; Original Research; Overexpression; Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; Protein expression; Ribonucleic acid; RNA; Survival; XRCC1 protein
• ISSN: 1758-8359; 1758-8340; 1758-8359
• DOI: 10.1177/1758835920958354

Background: The lack of molecular targets for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has limited treatment options and reduced survivorship. Identifying new molecular targets may help improve patient survival and decrease recurrence and metastasis. As DNA repair defects are prevalent in breast cancer, we evaluated the expression and repair capacities of DNA repair proteins in preclinical models. Methods: DNA repair capacity was analyzed in four TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-157 (MDA-157), MDA-MB-231 (MDA-231), MDA-MB-468 (MDA-468), and HCC1806, using fluorescence multiplex host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) assays. Expression of DNA repair genes was analyzed with RNA-seq, and protein expression was evaluated with immunoblot. Responses to the combination of DNA damage response inhibitors and primary chemotherapy drugs doxorubicin or carboplatin were evaluated in the cell lines. Results: Defects in base excision and nucleotide excision repair were observed in preclinical TNBC models. Gene expression analysis showed a limited correlation between these defects. Loss in protein expression was a better indicator of these DNA repair defects. Over-expression of PARP1, XRCC1, RPA, DDB1, and ERCC1 was observed in TNBC preclinical models, and likely contributed to altered sensitivity to chemotherapy and DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors. Improved cell killing was achieved when primary therapy was combined with DDR inhibitors for ATM, ATR, or CHK1. Conclusion: Base excision and nucleotide excision repair pathways may offer new molecular targets for TNBC. The functional status of DNA repair pathways should be considered when evaluating new therapies and may improve the targeting for primary and combination therapies with DDR inhibitors.