Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Are They Truly Still "Enemies"?

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Lithuania), 2024-04, Vol.60 (4), p.522
• Main Authors: Fogante, Marco, Volpato, Giovanni, Esposto Pirani, Paolo, Cela, Fatjon, Compagnucci, Paolo, Valeri, Yari, Selimi, Adelina, Alfieri, Michele, Brugiatelli, Leonardo, Belleggia, Sara, Coraducci, Francesca, Argalia, Giulio, Casella, Michela, Dello Russo, Antonio, Schicchi, Nicolò
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arrhythmias, Cardiac - diagnostic imaging; Cardiac arrhythmia; cardiac implantable electronic device; cardiac magnetic resonance; Cardiomyopathy; Cardiovascular disease; Catheters; Contraindications; Defibrillators, Implantable - standards; Edema; Ejection fraction; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Heart; Heart failure; Humans; implantable cardiac defibrillator; Implants, Artificial; Infections; Ischemia; loop recorder; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Myocarditis; pacemaker; Pacemaker, Artificial; Patients; Pericarditis; Prosthesis; safety; Scanning devices; Veins & arteries
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina60040522

The application of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in clinical practice has grown due to technological advancements and expanded clinical indications, highlighting its superior capabilities when compared to echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial tissue. Similarly, the utilization of implantable cardiac electronic devices (CIEDs) has significantly increased in cardiac arrhythmia management, and the requirements of CMR examinations in patients with CIEDs has become more common. However, this type of exam often presents challenges due to safety concerns and image artifacts. Until a few years ago, the presence of CIED was considered an absolute contraindication to CMR. To address these challenges, various technical improvements in CIED technology, like the reduction of the ferromagnetic components, and in CMR examinations, such as the introduction of new sequences, have been developed. Moreover, a rigorous protocol involving multidisciplinary collaboration is recommended for safe CMR examinations in patients with CIEDs, emphasizing risk assessment, careful monitoring during CMR, and post-scan device evaluation. Alternative methods to CMR, such as computed tomography coronary angiography with tissue characterization techniques like dual-energy and photon-counting, offer alternative potential solutions, although their diagnostic accuracy and availability do limit their use. Despite technological advancements, close collaboration and specialized staff training remain crucial for obtaining safe diagnostic CMR images in patients with CIEDs, thus justifying the presence of specialized centers that are equipped to handle these type of exams.