Loading…

Evaluation of Brazilian women’s participation in the CNPQ in the field of medical research

Abstract Introduction: Brazilian scientific production has shown substantial growth and achieved international visibility. However, in general, the participation of women in scientific activities remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the indicators of scientific productivity of wo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Revista brasileira de educação médica 2024, Vol.48 (2)
Main Authors: Keffer, Gabriele Martins, Sousa, Árlen Almeida Duarte de, Oliveira, Fabrício Emanuel, Magalhães, Marcelo José da Silva, Oliveira, Eduardo Araújo, Martelli Júnior, Hercílio
Format: Article
Language:eng ; por
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction: Brazilian scientific production has shown substantial growth and achieved international visibility. However, in general, the participation of women in scientific activities remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the indicators of scientific productivity of women fellows of the Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) in the field of Medicine. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 541 (211 women, 39%) researchers registered as recipients of CNPq research productivity (PQ) scholarships in Medicine according to a list provided in December 2022. Results: There was a predominance of male researchers (n=330; 61%). In both the male and female groups, most researchers were at level 2, with 62.5% women and 47.2% men (p=0.018). All 211 female PQ scholars were distributed among 37 different institutions and published 34,969 papers in scientific journals, averaging 165.7 articles per researcher. In the last five years of the study period (from 2018 to 2022), 9,679 papers were published. Over their careers, the 211 researchers supervised 5,440 undergraduate research students, 4,144 master’s degree students, and 2,923 PhD candidates. There was a significant difference between the scholarship levels for the development of human resources in undergraduate research (p=0.040), master’s degree (p=0.027), and PhD. (p
ISSN:0100-5502
1981-5271
1981-5271
DOI:10.1590/1981-5271v48.2-2023-0271.ing