Loading…

Age and gender differences in seven tests of functional mobility

The objective of this study was to examine age and gender differences in seven tests of functional mobility. The study included 50 young participants aged 20 to 39 years, and 684 older participants aged 75 to 98 years. Functional mobility measures included the coordinated stability test, the near ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2009-07, Vol.6 (1), p.31-31, Article 31
Main Authors: Butler, Annie A, Menant, Jasmine C, Tiedemann, Anne C, Lord, Stephen R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this study was to examine age and gender differences in seven tests of functional mobility. The study included 50 young participants aged 20 to 39 years, and 684 older participants aged 75 to 98 years. Functional mobility measures included the coordinated stability test, the near tandem balance test, the six metre walk test, the sit to stand test with five repetitions, the alternate step test and the stair ascent and descent tests. Older participants performed significantly worse than the younger participants in all of the functional mobility tests (p < 0.001), with the older women performing worse than the older men in all of the tests (p < 0.05). Significant correlations were found within the older group among all the functional mobility tests scores (r = 0.24-0.87, p < 0.001), and between functional mobility performance and age (r = 0.14-0.35, p < 0.001). People with arthritis and stroke performed worse than people without these conditions in these tests. This study provides a normative database for performance of young and older community-dwelling people in a battery of validated and reliable functional mobility tests. The results confirm age-related differences in functional mobility between young and older adults.
ISSN:1743-0003
1743-0003
DOI:10.1186/1743-0003-6-31