Loading…
Acquisition and Tracking Assembly I
A brassboard laser-beacon and optical tracking subsystem, representative of corresponding portions of a space optical communications subsystem, was built and tested. The objective was to evaluate acquisition, tracking, and pointing capabilities using components feasible for space. A one-way link was...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | A brassboard laser-beacon and optical tracking subsystem, representative of corresponding portions of a space optical communications subsystem, was built and tested. The objective was to evaluate acquisition, tracking, and pointing capabilities using components feasible for space. A one-way link was established between the beacons from one terminal, and the tracker from a second terminal. Attenuation simulating the space path loss between a low-orbit satellite and a synchronous satellite was introduced. Limit cycle and orbital motions of a satellite were simulated. Six-in. -aperture, off-axis parabolas and representative lasers and detectors were used. A Q-switched Nd: YAG transmitted 20-ns pulses at 1/10-sec intervals for coarse acquisition and a HeNe modulated cw laser was the beacon for fine acquisition and tracking. In coarse acquisition, the pulses were received by quadrant photodetectors. An image-dissector tracker acquired and then tracked the HeNe beacon by means of fine-steering mirrors with a response of 300 Hz and a large gimballed mirror with a 10-Hz response. Overall performance was measured by pointing an HeCd laser from the tracking terminal toward a pointing detector at the beacon terminal. Performance with components operating on space applicable principles and under simulated space, optical and motion conditions was satisfactory. Acquisition times averaged 5.6 sec. Two-axis pointing accuracy, under the predicted signal conditions, was 0.3 microrad rms, somewhat better than the predicted 0.4 microrad rms, or 1/10 of the transmitted bandwidth. Typical peak-to-peak pointing error excursions were about 1.5 microradians. (Author) |
---|