Evaluation of Planning for Fish and Wildlife. Keystone Lake Project

The December 19, 1961, FWS planning report contained three well conceived recommendations pertinent to wildlife resources, viz: (1) a request for development of a plan to accommodate project zoning, (2) that all project lands acquired be clearly marked, and (3) that an approximate 3,701 ha (9,145 ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SPORT FISHING INST WASHINGTON D C
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
Administration and Management
Arkansas River
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Biology
DAMS
ECOLOGY
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
FISHES
Keystone Lake Project
LAND USE
NATURAL RESOURCES
OKLAHOMA
PLANNING
WILDLIFE
Wildlife management
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The December 19, 1961, FWS planning report contained three well conceived recommendations pertinent to wildlife resources, viz: (1) a request for development of a plan to accommodate project zoning, (2) that all project lands acquired be clearly marked, and (3) that an approximate 3,701 ha (9,145 ac) contiguous tract located on the Cimarron arm of the reservoir be purchased in fee, fenced at project expense, and licensed to the ODWC for wildlife management purposes. The recommendation for a zoning plan was subsequently implemented and lands off limits to hunting have been identified and signed. The CE rejected the FWS's recommendation for the purchase of the requested tract on the Cimarron arm of the reservoir because of unfavorable cost-benefit ratio (0.1) as computed by the CE. In 1974 a total of 6,273 ha (15,500 ac) of incidentally acquired project property (including 4,970 ha (12,280 ac) of land and 1,303 ha (3,220 ac)of water), divided between the Cimarron and Arkansas River arms of the reservoir, was licensed to the ODWC for wildlife management. In all, 6,274 ha (15,504 ac) of project lands are open to public hunting. The severe terrestrial wildlife losses anticipated by the FWS did not occur. Hunting effort currently supported by the project is greater than the FWS estimated hunting levels for resident terrestrial game species predicted for the area without-the-project. However, compensation has been achieved only as a result of intensive management involving substantial monetary outlays by the ODWC for fencing and habitat improvement programs.