Event-Related Potentials: The P3OO and Self-Referent Stimuli

This was an exploratory study designed to assess the effect of self-referent stimuli on the P300 component of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The stimuli were self-referent phrases. Self-referent phrases are phrases that are personally descriptive, and are, therefore, considered to be personally rel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ingram, Eben M
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
ARMY RESEARCH
CUES(STIMULI)
DECEPTION
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY
ERP(EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL)
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE
LIE DETECTORS
Medicine and Medical Research
NEURAL NETS
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS
Psychology
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
REACTION(PSYCHOLOGY)
STIMULATION(PHYSIOLOGY)
STRESS(PSYCHOLOGY)
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This was an exploratory study designed to assess the effect of self-referent stimuli on the P300 component of the electroencephalogram (EEG). The stimuli were self-referent phrases. Self-referent phrases are phrases that are personally descriptive, and are, therefore, considered to be personally relevant. Personal relevance was manipulated through the truthfulness of the self-referent phrases. The EEG was examined for the occurrence of the P300 wave of the human event-related brain potential. The P300 is a positive wave of the EEG that occurs 300 milliseconds after the onset of an eliciting stimulus. The P300 was examined for any effects on its amplitude having to do with the truthfulness of the stimuli. The EEG activity was recorded from 20 male subjects who were presented visual stimuli on a computer monitor. The stimuli consisted of five true and five false self-referent phrases. The two-word phrases were repeatedly presented in random order for a total of 300 presentations (150 presentations of the true and 150 of the false). The probability of occurrence of each of the two classes of stimuli was 0.50. The subjects were required to do nothing except read the stimuli. Results indicate that both true and false self-referent stimuli elicited clearly identifiable P300s. The difference between P300 amplitudes elicited by true and false stimuli, however, was not significant (p > .05).