Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis

Site response analyses have been completed at a number of large Department of Energy (DOE) project sites that are being analyzed for seismic safety. The objective of a site response analysis is to estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earthquake, that is shaking at sites that does not inc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sykora, David W, Costantino, Carl J, Heymsfield, Ernest, Abrahamson, Norman A
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
ACCELERATION
EARTHQUAKES
FREE FIELD
GROUND LEVEL
HAZARDS
ONE DIMENSIONAL
RESPONSE
SAFETY
SEISMIC QAVES
SEISMIC WAVES
Seismology
SHAKING
SITES
SOLUTIONS(GENERAL)
SPECTRA
TOPOGRAPHY
VARIATIONS
WAVES
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Sykora, David W
Costantino, Carl J
Heymsfield, Ernest
Abrahamson, Norman A
description Site response analyses have been completed at a number of large Department of Energy (DOE) project sites that are being analyzed for seismic safety. The objective of a site response analysis is to estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earthquake, that is shaking at sites that does not include effects caused by proximity to structures or topographic features, for a specific hazard level and set of site conditions. The requisite components for a site response analysis are: one or more design earthquake events with representative earthquake record(s), an idealization of the soil-rock system at the site of interest, and a scheme to generate response solutions to simplified assumed wave fields. Normally, the free-field ground response is presented in terms of either response spectra or the variation of acceleration or velocity with time. The alternative to conducting a site-specific response analysis is to use general sidelines recommended by Kennedy et al. (1990).
format report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>dtic_1RU</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA318807</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ADA318807</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3188073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPB1zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BMSU3MyaxKLMkE8oOTM1JzU4sV0vKLFPzzUnVdMnNT84qBMok5CsGZJakKQanFBfl5xakKjkChyuLMYh4G1rTEnOJUXijNzSDj5hri7KGbUpKZHF9ckpmXWhLv6OJobGhhYWBuTEAaAKkqMyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis</title><source>DTIC Technical Reports</source><creator>Sykora, David W ; Costantino, Carl J ; Heymsfield, Ernest ; Abrahamson, Norman A</creator><creatorcontrib>Sykora, David W ; Costantino, Carl J ; Heymsfield, Ernest ; Abrahamson, Norman A ; ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS GEOTECHNICAL LAB</creatorcontrib><description>Site response analyses have been completed at a number of large Department of Energy (DOE) project sites that are being analyzed for seismic safety. The objective of a site response analysis is to estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earthquake, that is shaking at sites that does not include effects caused by proximity to structures or topographic features, for a specific hazard level and set of site conditions. The requisite components for a site response analysis are: one or more design earthquake events with representative earthquake record(s), an idealization of the soil-rock system at the site of interest, and a scheme to generate response solutions to simplified assumed wave fields. Normally, the free-field ground response is presented in terms of either response spectra or the variation of acceleration or velocity with time. The alternative to conducting a site-specific response analysis is to use general sidelines recommended by Kennedy et al. (1990).</description><language>eng</language><subject>ACCELERATION ; EARTHQUAKES ; FREE FIELD ; GROUND LEVEL ; HAZARDS ; ONE DIMENSIONAL ; RESPONSE ; SAFETY ; SEISMIC QAVES ; SEISMIC WAVES ; Seismology ; SHAKING ; SITES ; SOLUTIONS(GENERAL) ; SPECTRA ; TOPOGRAPHY ; VARIATIONS ; WAVES</subject><creationdate>1996</creationdate><rights>APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,27567,27568</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA318807$$EView_record_in_DTIC$$FView_record_in_$$GDTIC$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sykora, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Carl J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, Norman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS GEOTECHNICAL LAB</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis</title><description>Site response analyses have been completed at a number of large Department of Energy (DOE) project sites that are being analyzed for seismic safety. The objective of a site response analysis is to estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earthquake, that is shaking at sites that does not include effects caused by proximity to structures or topographic features, for a specific hazard level and set of site conditions. The requisite components for a site response analysis are: one or more design earthquake events with representative earthquake record(s), an idealization of the soil-rock system at the site of interest, and a scheme to generate response solutions to simplified assumed wave fields. Normally, the free-field ground response is presented in terms of either response spectra or the variation of acceleration or velocity with time. The alternative to conducting a site-specific response analysis is to use general sidelines recommended by Kennedy et al. (1990).</description><subject>ACCELERATION</subject><subject>EARTHQUAKES</subject><subject>FREE FIELD</subject><subject>GROUND LEVEL</subject><subject>HAZARDS</subject><subject>ONE DIMENSIONAL</subject><subject>RESPONSE</subject><subject>SAFETY</subject><subject>SEISMIC QAVES</subject><subject>SEISMIC WAVES</subject><subject>Seismology</subject><subject>SHAKING</subject><subject>SITES</subject><subject>SOLUTIONS(GENERAL)</subject><subject>SPECTRA</subject><subject>TOPOGRAPHY</subject><subject>VARIATIONS</subject><subject>WAVES</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>1RU</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPB1zs8tSCzKLM7PU8hPU_BMSU3MyaxKLMkE8oOTM1JzU4sV0vKLFPzzUnVdMnNT84qBMok5CsGZJakKQanFBfl5xakKjkChyuLMYh4G1rTEnOJUXijNzSDj5hri7KGbUpKZHF9ckpmXWhLv6OJobGhhYWBuTEAaAKkqMyw</recordid><startdate>199611</startdate><enddate>199611</enddate><creator>Sykora, David W</creator><creator>Costantino, Carl J</creator><creator>Heymsfield, Ernest</creator><creator>Abrahamson, Norman A</creator><scope>1RU</scope><scope>BHM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199611</creationdate><title>Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis</title><author>Sykora, David W ; Costantino, Carl J ; Heymsfield, Ernest ; Abrahamson, Norman A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3188073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>ACCELERATION</topic><topic>EARTHQUAKES</topic><topic>FREE FIELD</topic><topic>GROUND LEVEL</topic><topic>HAZARDS</topic><topic>ONE DIMENSIONAL</topic><topic>RESPONSE</topic><topic>SAFETY</topic><topic>SEISMIC QAVES</topic><topic>SEISMIC WAVES</topic><topic>Seismology</topic><topic>SHAKING</topic><topic>SITES</topic><topic>SOLUTIONS(GENERAL)</topic><topic>SPECTRA</topic><topic>TOPOGRAPHY</topic><topic>VARIATIONS</topic><topic>WAVES</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sykora, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costantino, Carl J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heymsfield, Ernest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, Norman A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS GEOTECHNICAL LAB</creatorcontrib><collection>DTIC Technical Reports</collection><collection>DTIC STINET</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sykora, David W</au><au>Costantino, Carl J</au><au>Heymsfield, Ernest</au><au>Abrahamson, Norman A</au><aucorp>ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION VICKSBURG MS GEOTECHNICAL LAB</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><btitle>Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis</btitle><date>1996-11</date><risdate>1996</risdate><abstract>Site response analyses have been completed at a number of large Department of Energy (DOE) project sites that are being analyzed for seismic safety. The objective of a site response analysis is to estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earthquake, that is shaking at sites that does not include effects caused by proximity to structures or topographic features, for a specific hazard level and set of site conditions. The requisite components for a site response analysis are: one or more design earthquake events with representative earthquake record(s), an idealization of the soil-rock system at the site of interest, and a scheme to generate response solutions to simplified assumed wave fields. Normally, the free-field ground response is presented in terms of either response spectra or the variation of acceleration or velocity with time. The alternative to conducting a site-specific response analysis is to use general sidelines recommended by Kennedy et al. (1990).</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_dtic_stinet_ADA318807
source DTIC Technical Reports
subjects ACCELERATION
EARTHQUAKES
FREE FIELD
GROUND LEVEL
HAZARDS
ONE DIMENSIONAL
RESPONSE
SAFETY
SEISMIC QAVES
SEISMIC WAVES
Seismology
SHAKING
SITES
SOLUTIONS(GENERAL)
SPECTRA
TOPOGRAPHY
VARIATIONS
WAVES
title Comparison of Idealization Schemes for One-Dimensional Site Response Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A47%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-dtic_1RU&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Comparison%20of%20Idealization%20Schemes%20for%20One-Dimensional%20Site%20Response%20Analysis&rft.au=Sykora,%20David%20W&rft.aucorp=ARMY%20ENGINEER%20WATERWAYS%20EXPERIMENT%20STATION%20VICKSBURG%20MS%20GEOTECHNICAL%20LAB&rft.date=1996-11&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cdtic_1RU%3EADA318807%3C/dtic_1RU%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-dtic_stinet_ADA3188073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true