A Kill is a Kill: Asymmetrically Attacking U.S. Airpower

As the 2Oth Century closes, efforts towards organizing, training, and equipping U.S. airpower assets remain based on the assumption of face-to-face conventional confrontations. This is a comforting hypothesis, as U.S. technological superiority should keep the odds stacked in out favor for decades to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O'Halloran, Michael A
Format: Report
Language:English
Subjects:
AIR POWER
ASYMMETRY
ATTRITION
COUNTERMEASURES
FRICTION
HYPOTHESES
KILL PROBABILITIES
Military Aircraft Operations
STRATEGY
TACTICAL WARFARE
TARGETING
THESES
THREATS
UNITED STATES
WARFARE
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As the 2Oth Century closes, efforts towards organizing, training, and equipping U.S. airpower assets remain based on the assumption of face-to-face conventional confrontations. This is a comforting hypothesis, as U.S. technological superiority should keep the odds stacked in out favor for decades to come. Air strategists may be overlooking the fact, however, that this very technological superiority may force adversaries to counter U.S. airpower with other than conventional methods. Couple this with the strong possibility that the interests of the U.S. and our opponents will likely be found on opposite ends of the spectrum of war, and U.S. airpower could be in for some surprises. This study analyzes the asymmetric threat to U.S. airpower across the political, operational, and tactical levels of war and examines whether the U.S. has adequately prepared itself to counter asymmetrical measures against its airpower assets. The answers are not reassuring. U.S. airpower is not likely to overwhelming technological capability by increasing friction levels and changing our visions of surgical warfare into an attrition reality. They will attempt to inflict virtual attrition as well by changing U.S. targeting strategies and reducing our effectiveness while buying themselves time to attain their objectives. In this respect, U.S. airpower can be strategically defeated.